[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.15054142 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1523x1406, 00000000.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15054142

>>15052975
>And thus is insecure until proven otherwise.
Sure, I can agree to that. But that doesn't mean that it's actually insecure though. And they have said themselves that it isn't done yet.
>"Impenetrability", "governments can't block us", "anonymous" (at least they fixed that one on their page), "can detect even the smallest alteration", etc, etc. Theres a lot of it.
Where do you even find these?
And what's wrong with it? The encryption makes it impenetrable, a government can't (wont) block a user as a user is just ANYONE with a computer, you can't see if they use sentinels dVPN therefore they cant block it.
"Can detect even the smallest alteration"
Where did you read this? Becuase I'd need the context to understand what is being said.
>Except they're shilling it as a way to get the best privacy and " defeat the firewall of China "
They aren't "shilling" socks5 as the best privacy, they are "shilling" their dVPN as the best software for privacy, which it is, a dVPN is miles ahead of anything that we currently have.
The chinese people desperately needs something like this that cannot be blocked.
I'm pretty sure that you're gonna push for TOR here but your ISP always knows if you use TOR if you don't use TOR with a VPN but VPNs are banned in China and using a centralized (company) VPN is just moving the trust from your ISP to your VPN. Also your ISP will know you are using a VPN because a VPNs IP range is public and known to ISPs while a dVPN just looks like a connection to any other computer in the world.
>github link. you should be able to figure it out if you aren't retarded
No, you made the claim so it's up to you to point out what's insecure about the code here. If you do so I'll reply with either an explanation or an opinion of mine. If you don't I'll take it as you spewing bullshit yet again like all of your other points you've made.

>> No.15030527 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1523x1406, 00000000.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15030527

>>15030446
Binance is not dead.
Yes there is a token swap later and binance will support the token swap.
It won't be hard to trade it once it is on binance or when mainnet is released.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]