/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30376942
Fucking based. Family is everything

>>28609682
How much anon
Tell us

Yesterday’s thread:
>>28360185

Relevant threads:
>>27590984
>>27665347
>>28127392

http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
>The Daily Short Sale Volume Files provide aggregated volume by security for all short sale trades executed and reported to a TRF, the ADF, or the ORF during normal market hours for public dissemination purposes (i.e., media-reported trades). There are individual files for the volume associated with trades reported to each TRF (FINRA/Nasdaq Chicago, FINRA/Nasdaq Carteret, FINRA/NYSE), the ADF, and the ORF. There is also a file entitled "Consolidated TRF/ADF Daily Short Sale Volume Files," which combines the volume for trades in exchange-listed securities reported to the TRFs and the ADF.

1. FINRA Consolidated NMS
Out of a total volume of 6204532, 2234229 was short volume (approximately 36.1%)
2. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago
Out of a total volume of 150590, 95983
was short volume (approximately 63.7%)
3. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret
Out of a total volume of 4330922, 1464916 was short volume (approximately 33.8%)
4. FINRA/NYSE TRF
Out of a total volume of 1723020, 673330 was short volume (approximately 39.1%)

While both FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago and FINRA/NYSE TRF saw increases in short volume (the former from 53.8% to 63.7% and the latter from 38.7% to 39.1%) in comparison to yesterday, FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret logged a decrease (from 34.7% to 33.8%), and FINRA Consolidated NMS retained the same percentage as yesterday.

Some weird price movement at the start of today, too: it was up 7.49% near open before dropping down and ultimately closing at -0.20%. We’ve seen this sort of odd short-lived spike in the price for three days straight now, starting with the 10% spike during AH on Tuesday (and continuing with the 22.24% spike yesterday).

http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
>The Daily Short Sale Volume Files provide aggregated volume by security for all short sale trades executed and reported to a TRF, the ADF, or the ORF during normal market hours for public dissemination purposes (i.e., media-reported trades). There are individual files for the volume associated with trades reported to each TRF (FINRA/Nasdaq Chicago, FINRA/Nasdaq Carteret, FINRA/NYSE), the ADF, and the ORF. There is also a file entitled "Consolidated TRF/ADF Daily Short Sale Volume Files," which combines the volume for trades in exchange-listed securities reported to the TRFs and the ADF.

1. FINRA Consolidated NMS
Out of a total volume of 18257999, 6587323 was short volume (approximately 36.1%)
2. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago
Out of a total volume of 283950, 152892 was short volume (approximately 53.8%)
3. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret
Out of a total volume of 12958191, 4491996 was short volume (approximately 34.7%)
4. FINRA/NYSE TRF
Out of a total volume of 5015858, 1942435 was short volume (approximately 38.7%)

The decrease in short sale volume from the 50-60% range observed on Thursday, Friday, Monday, and Tuesday (I didn’t make a thread for yesterday, but I did parse the data; you can check for yourself if you don’t believe me) can be explained by GME’s inclusion on the Short Sale Restriction List for today (ftp://ftp.nyxdata.com/NYSEGroupSSRCircuitBreakers/NYSEGroupSSRCircuitBreakers_2021/NYSEGroupSSRCircuitBreakers_202102/). This will no longer be in effect tomorrow.

Thursday's Thread: >>27778727

Friday's Thread:
>>27894917

Relevant Threads:
>>27590984

>>27665347

>>28127392

http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
>The Daily Short Sale Volume Files provide aggregated volume by security for all short sale trades executed and reported to a TRF, the ADF, or the ORF during normal market hours for public dissemination purposes (i.e., media-reported trades). There are individual files for the volume associated with trades reported to each TRF (FINRA/Nasdaq Chicago, FINRA/Nasdaq Carteret, FINRA/NYSE), the ADF, and the ORF. There is also a file entitled "Consolidated TRF/ADF Daily Short Sale Volume Files," which combines the volume for trades in exchange-listed securities reported to the TRFs and the ADF.

1. FINRA Consolidated NMS
Out of a total volume of 11348581, 6404809 was short volume (approximately 56.4%)
2. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago
Out of a total volume of 279675, 171151 was short volume (approximately 61.2%)
3. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret
Out of a total volume of 7921924, 4689372 was short volume (approximately 59.1%)
4. FINRA/NYSE TRF
Out of a total volume of 3146982, 1544286 was short volume (approximately 50%)

With the exception of the short sale volume for FINRA/NYSE TRF (which remains the same as it was on Friday), all TRFs have logged increases in daily short sale volume since Friday:

FINRA Consolidated NMS went from 55.1% to 56.4%
FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago went from 45.6% to 61.2%
FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret went from 57.4% to 59.1%

Short interest report comes out after close tomorrow. As to whether or not the effect of naked selling and the ever-increasing FTDs will be reflected in the new short interest percentage: I don't know. Short activity is definitely alive and well, though. Low volume today, too—only about 25 million.

Yesterday's thread: >>27787639

Relevant threads:
>>27596883 (Part 1)

>>27671038 (Part 2)

http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
>The Daily Short Sale Volume Files provide aggregated volume by security for all short sale trades executed and reported to a TRF, the ADF, or the ORF during normal market hours for public dissemination purposes (i.e., media-reported trades). There are individual files for the volume associated with trades reported to each TRF (FINRA/Nasdaq Chicago, FINRA/Nasdaq Carteret, FINRA/NYSE), the ADF, and the ORF. There is also a file entitled "Consolidated TRF/ADF Daily Short Sale Volume Files," which combines the volume for trades in exchange-listed securities reported to the TRFs and the ADF.

1. FINRA Consolidated NMS
Out of a total volume of 34566363, 19063724 was short volume (approximately 55.1%)
2. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago
Out of a total volume of 753081, 343105 was short volume (approximately 45.6%)
3. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret
Out of a total volume of 24478070, 14052965 was short volume (approximately 57.4%)
4. FINRA/NYSE TRF
Out of a total volume of 9335212, 4667654 was short volume (approximately 50%)

It is worth noting that in comparison to yesterday's short volume, every TRF (Trade Reporting Facility) logged an increase in Daily Short Sale Volume with the exception of FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago, which went from 46.3% yesterday to 45.6% today. In my opinion, the increases in the other three are more significant:

FINRA Consolidated NMS went from 50.3% to 55.1%
FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret went from 53.9% to 57.4%
FINRA/NYSE TRF went from 41.7% to 50%

http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
>The Daily Short Sale Volume Files provide aggregated volume by security for all short sale trades executed and reported to a TRF, the ADF, or the ORF during normal market hours for public dissemination purposes (i.e., media-reported trades). There are individual files for the volume associated with trades reported to each TRF (FINRA/Nasdaq Chicago, FINRA/Nasdaq Carteret, FINRA/NYSE), the ADF, and the ORF. There is also a file entitled "Consolidated TRF/ADF Daily Short Sale Volume Files," which combines the volume for trades in exchange-listed securities reported to the TRFs and the ADF.

1. FINRA Consolidated NMS
Out of a total volume of 28355377, 14272780 was short volume (approximately 50.3%)
2. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Chicago
Out of a total volume of 677772, 313969 was short volume (approximately 46.3%)
3. FINRA/NASDAQ TRF Carteret
Out of a total volume of 19725076, 10640122 was short volume (approximately 53.9%)
4. FINRA/NYSE TRF
Out of a total volume of 7952529, 3318689 was short volume (approximately 41.7%)

We are still waiting till the 9th for the latest short interest report.

As a sidenote, https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm shows that the number of FTDs (Fails To Deliver) is 621483 (out of a total 69,750,000 outstanding shares) as of January 14th. However, a lot has happened since then and it is unclear when the SEC will provide updated information, given that the most recent FTD dataset is titled "January 2021, first half".

Another point of interest: according to the 13 G/A BlackRock Inc. filed on the 26th of January (https://fintel.io/so/us/gme)), they retain institutional ownership of 9,217,335 shares (approximately 13.2% of the aforementioned 69,750,000 total outstanding shares). I'm unsure as to whether this is an increase from their previous position; I vaguely remember "12%" floating around when discussing BlackRock's ownership. I might be wrong, though.

I am not a financial advisor.

>>27669376
rubic is an exchange token for the exchange rubic.exchange. basically, do you hate paying $60+ just do a trade on uniswap? I sure do. rubic.exchange is trying to use binance smart chain as a layer 2 solution through cross chain swaps. Since it's expensive to do transactions on ethereum, it'd be cheaper to do on a different chain like BSC. This is one of the premises of this exchange. Secondly, being able to do cross chain swaps, means that americans like me will now be able to have access to assets we'd unotherwise be cucked out of on binance. This means that rubic.exchange will be the go to dex to get these assets. Moreover, they're are going to be implementing an anonymizer that allows transactions through their exchange to be private. That's pretty huge if you ask me. Also they're going to be implementing cross chain swaps with polkadot but you can read more about it on their website. There's more to it but i suggest you to do your diligence about the project and visit their site.

>>27512368

Do you hate baconator, do you like baconator?

many unanswered questions here

>>27484531
Pic has a TG you can look at for clues, anon.

How much time do we have before we're all sent off to die in forced labor camps?

27 here... fuuuu

Who is overloading the ETH network?

don't LP shares only give you priority staking in the network? They aren't even required. if that's the case I'd say an outright link buy is always a better choice
correct me if im wrong

>>15803434
I always enjoyed the skeletons. Very spooky. Nice pick.
>>15804035
The knight's were awesome too. Enjoyed building it back in the heydays of RuneScape.

>>10511033
I'm about half way through the call, credit suisse first on call for the Q/A session, fucking lol
some words about their contracts actually switching out every 3 months due to slow down in the Permian basin, but HCLP seems to believe that while there is slowdown of growth, the growth of demand for sand doesn't recede

shale oil is extremely light; I can see how fucking massively profitable this must be for the U.S.
having china demand something from the U.S. is also pretty nice; it gives us a bargaining chip in the trade war
If we win the trade war too; or the trade war reached white peace? U.S. produced light crude from the permian will fucking boom, the tariffs being gone will make things go hog fucking wild
just a matter of time and waiting

>>10511162
my empire is fuck you, make good trades and don't die; I'm not writing all these notebooks with financial information and business formation requirements for them to be put in an attic somewhere and forgotten, I have my plans but I will be certain of my steps before I make a move
you just concern yourself with not dying

I was worried about getting liquidated on my longs but then i realized liquid chocolate is the bomb.

link doesnt work mongoloid apparently you failed

>>8402822
>Doesn't understand how staking works

I feel bad for straight guys

Invested into link earlier today

>>6802072
post pics or trolling

>>3724593
ok, now post something GOOD

>>2118223

Thanks for the laugh anon. Not at your despair, but the way you worded your suffering.