/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29670886
I remember this one, good times. Kinda crazy how Polkadot managed to rebound from that loss

>>12837048
imagine sending funds to a contract you haven't audited, kek, i even audit stupid games like ethshrimp to make sure there's no dumb traps.

Most of you won't understand the greatness of this picture

>>11196227
Get keys into hardware wallet or paperwallet PRONTO.

What would be the standard way to, as comprehensively as possible, take a physical asset and tokenize it in a legally valid way, right now (with the tools available on Ethereum etc)?

I'm actually doing this for a client of mine as a freelancer. Here's the scenario: he has a painting, the ownership of which he wants to tokenize and distribute to the hands(wallets) of multiple investors, which at first, he predicts will just be a few of his friends. (assume all the legal details are of no importance to me - he says he'll handle that portion with his lawyers and cover the legal ties between the asset and the deployed token contract, and dealing with the SEC and their hard dick for "security tokens" which this obviously would be)

Now obviously I could just copy+paste a vanilla ERC20 token contract and shit it out onto the mainnet, and have 100% of the token supply go initially to his wallet address so he could arrange to sell it OTC to his buddies. But what's the simplest way I could set up a couple contracts to automate the sale of those tokens, trustlessly, to whomever he wants to offer it to?

Maybe a question for actual Ethereum devs, so meaning 0% of /biz/. But if anyone has suggestions, I'd still love to hear em

I'm learning some Solidity, and since I'm too lazy to set up Truffle properly I've just been deploying every broken iteration of my not-yet-finished contracts on Ropsten, cuz why not. It's fast and allows me to see exactly what a given contract will look like before I deploy it on mainnet.

That got me thinking, are there any big-name projects whose fucked up abortions of their tokens can be found on Ropsten?

Like say for example Request, before they actually released on mainnet, tested a bunch of versions of the REQ token on Ropsten, before all the bugs were worked out. You'd theoretically be able to see every cringy error in the code as it went along, just by searching for REQ in the ropsten Etherscan.

Currently if you do that, you can see there are about 10 instances of contracts named REQ on the Ropsten chain - of course all of them are actually surely just junior Solidity noobs slapping the REQ name on their babby's first token contract because anyone can do that.

But are there any verified cases where devs of a now-legit project dumped shitty pre-release versions of their contract code on Ropsten, which you can peruse and laugh at? I would guess not, as if I was working on a serious project I wouldn't want people to be able to see every mistake I made in the development process. For that matter, if I WERE to actually work on a respectable project down the line, would it be considered a faux pas to do that?

devops199

>>4945453
Cool story bro.

>>4927880
Bitcoin is being devloped to do a few things very well and maintain its decentralized and scarce nature. Eth is being developed more brazenly and wants to be a swiss army knife. Eth always has neat stuff being dveloped, but also definitely has a larger attack surface.

>>4815422

Taken from the whitepaper of Ankorus which is a project that wants to revolutionze exchanges connecting the stock market with the crypto world. (don't wanna shill to much but its pretty cool, definitely worth checking out). But here's the thing that I wanted to share taken from their whitepaper:

''There are 42,400 dormant bitcoin addresses, each with a balance of 25 bitcoins or more.

Total dormant bitcoins: 3,380,582.''

Fuck thats a lot of BTC... thats 20%! of the circulating supply, since these BTC are effectively out of circulation it would mean the marketcap of BTC should be: 27.11billion$ less. Making it: $108.46billion instead of the current $135.58billion.

Quite some numbers huh?

>>4494041
Larping nocoiners and butt-hurt shitcoiners trying to force a flippening to take revenge for their poor decisions and gullible natures.

>>4451343
>Says increasingly poor man for 7th time this year.

Thinking of getting a Ledger Nano S

I see that EtherDelta has some kind of compatability with it. Will it let me directly deposit my ERC20 tokens into EtherDelta for trading without having to go through Metamask (which I have been using up until now)?

How many of you actually earn neat little profits from people not knowing how to use Ether Delta and fat fingering their trades?

Cash out you faggot
33wgMz1rLFUeJHHtvyaTa4LpWh4vnjVzzQ

Can we have a legit discussion about Ethereum? I know most people here hate it but are there any fags that bought in low like me that are unsure on its future? I bought in at $10 and have just added to my stack since then but I'm starting to get unsure. First of all, Ethereum isn't a currency it's more of a gas, so what is the incentive exactly to drive the price up? If it gets the adoption it wants, should banks and shit want cheap 'fuel' as an incentive to use it in the first place? Bitcoin is primarily used for finance, money in general so obviously it has a purpose for a price increase. Ethereum... doesn't really from what I understand.

tl;dr why am i still holding ethereum, should I just trade for bitcoin? does ethereum have a possibility of ever being $1000+?

>>4235720