/biz/ - Business & Finance

>be Sergey
>get absolutely rekt over the falsely implied SWIFT connection last night without a single linkie being able to salvage the image
>start sweating burger sauce
>"Hey Phil, you think you can just run the blog post thing again tomorrow? We need a little boost, morale is low and we're getting exposed. We must remind them."
>"No problem Sergs mate, will do."
>newfag cringe frogshit memery all over the place

>>16619193

Not only was it proved in this thread that Google, as an entity is not using Chainlink in any capacity for its own services but it was also proved that, painfully for the LINK bagholder, SWIFT and R3's Corda Settler are using in-house solutions. Why would they insert a proprietary and inefficient middleman for something they can do themselves much better without using Yiffereum or shitcoins, and for free?

Sergey was clearly shaken and the shaking probably went on for a good few minutes due to his gelatinous mass. He needed to pump the image. This does not bode well for the 'project'. Bear in mind, its no coincidence that this was the day after my thread, Google hadn't said anything for a long time if at all since first mention. Why re-post an old article link that's already been posted before, less than 24 hours after getting BTFO?

Besides, don't take this Google thing too seriously. You see it as this massive company with really strict policies and whatnot, but in reality what you're imagining is Apple, where the micromanagement is so extreme that a user manual text on an obscure accessory made in house can't even have its font changed to one size larger without the CEO knowing about it. Google is a loosely held spiders web of fragmented sectors. Google employees and departments/branches have an lots of autonomy, this is Google's structure and everyone knows that.