/biz/ - Business & Finance

Kleros Sirs what is going on with PNK?
>KuCoin listing turned out to be fake
>Ledger integration turned out to be fake
>Binance listing turned out to be fake
>V2 turned out to be fake
>Confirmation of IRL assets with Kleros turned out to be fake
>Twitter integration turned out to be fake

Alright, it's time to shut Parsnip shills the fuck up forever.

>Muh smart triggers

If Parsiq was valuable, every frontrunning bot, blockchain HFT, and data-intensive player in the space would be running on it. Fact of the matter is, programmatic preconf event triggers as a service aren't a particularly defensible or lucrative business, no matter how revolutionary Anatoly's approach to it is. "Do y the moment x happens onchain" is a relatively low-capital and commoditized value proposition.

This is why so many people do it in house, and why Parsiq has viable competitors. The company I'm at took the in-house approach because if instantaneous responses to events are mission critical, the latency between servers is a compounding performance liability. This concern for this niche use case applies to The Graph as well.

An example of a competitor in the event triggers space is EPNS/PUSH, decentralized and powered by The Graph of course, which has a similar market capitalization to Parsiq. We love them to death but nobody's under the illusion that they're a trillion dollar protocol, but /biz/ unfortunately has shills like Omega deluding Parsnips like lambs to the slaughter with hollow promises of such future gains.

For those who don't depend on preconf events, Parsiq must contend with The Graph and a sea of other players.

>Muh IQ protocol

NFT. Lending. Get outta here. The worst pivot in the history of pivots, maybe ever. Completely different token for some reason, probably to milk retail some more, with airdrops and staking for PRQ baggies as a consolation prize. There will be NFT lending in the future, but it won't be for the trash you bought with your life savings on OpenSea last year, and there will be far more mature, well-funded, and better connected players overseas facilitating the integration of tokenized offchain real assets with DeFi.

Alright, it's time to shut Parsnip shills the fuck up forever.

>Muh smart triggers

If Parsiq was valuable, every frontrunning bot, blockchain HFT, and data-intensive player in the space would be running on it. Fact of the matter is, programmatic preconf event triggers as a service aren't a particularly defensible or lucrative business, no matter how revolutionary Anatoly's approach to it is. "Do y the moment x happens onchain" is a relatively low-capital and commoditized value proposition.

This is why so many people do it in house, and why Parsiq has viable competitors. The company I'm at took the in-house approach because if instantaneous responses to events are mission critical, the latency between servers is a compounding performance liability. This concern for this niche use case applies to The Graph as well.

An example of a competitor in the event triggers space is EPNS/PUSH, decentralized and powered by The Graph of course, which has a similar market capitalization to Parsiq. We love them to death but nobody's under the illusion that they're a trillion dollar protocol, but /biz/ unfortunately has shills like Omega deluding Parsnips like lambs to the slaughter with hollow promises of such future gains.

For those who don't depend on preconf events, Parsiq must contend with The Graph and a sea of other players.

>Muh IQ protocol

NFT. Lending. Get outta here. The worst pivot in the history of pivots, maybe ever. Completely different token for some reason, probably to milk retail some more, with airdrops and staking for PRQ baggies as a consolation prize. There will be NFT lending in the future, but it won't be for the trash you bought with your life savings on OpenSea last year, and there will be far more mature, well-funded, and better connected players overseas facilitating the integration of tokenized offchain real assets with DeFi.

Alright, it's time to shut Parsnip shills the fuck up forever.

>Muh smart triggers

If Parsiq was valuable, every frontrunning bot, blockchain HFT, and data-intensive player in the space would be running on it. Fact of the matter is, programmatic preconf event triggers as a service aren't a particularly defensible or lucrative business, no matter how revolutionary Anatoly's approach to it is. "Do y the moment x happens onchain" is a relatively low-capital and commoditized value proposition.

This is why so many people do it in house, and why Parsiq has viable competitors. The company I'm at took the in-house approach because if instantaneous responses to events are mission critical, the latency between servers is a compounding performance liability. This concern for this niche use case applies to The Graph as well.

An example of a competitor in the event triggers space is EPNS/PUSH, decentralized and powered by The Graph of course, which has a similar market capitalization to Parsiq. We love them to death but nobody's under the illusion that they're a trillion dollar protocol, but /biz/ unfortunately has shills like Omega deluding Parsnips like lambs to the slaughter with hollow promises of such future gains.

For those who don't depend on preconf events, Parsiq must contend with The Graph and a sea of other players.

>Muh IQ protocol

NFT. Lending. Get outta here. The worst pivot in the history of pivots, maybe ever. Completely different token for some reason, probably to milk retail some more, with airdrops and staking for PRQ baggies as a consolation prize. There will be NFT lending in the future, but it won't be for the trash you bought with your life savings on OpenSea last year, and there will be far more mature, well-funded, and better connected players overseas facilitating the integration of tokenized offchain real assets with DeFi.

PNK is going to 1c

Alright, it's time to shut Parsnip shills the fuck up forever.

>Muh smart triggers

If Parsiq was valuable, every frontrunning bot, blockchain HFT, and data-intensive player in the space would be running on it. Fact of the matter is, programmatic preconf event triggers as a service aren't a particularly defensible or lucrative business, no matter how revolutionary Anatoly's approach to it is. "Do y the moment x happens onchain" is a relatively low-capital and commoditized value proposition.

This is why so many people do it in house, and why Parsiq has viable competitors. The company I'm at took the in-house approach because if instantaneous responses to events are mission critical, the latency between servers is a compounding performance liability. This concern for this niche use case applies to The Graph as well.

An example of a competitor in the event triggers space is EPNS/PUSH, decentralized and powered by The Graph of course, which has a similar market capitalization to Parsiq. We love them to death but nobody's under the illusion that they're a trillion dollar protocol, but /biz/ unfortunately has shills like Omega deluding Parsnips like lambs to the slaughter with hollow promises of such future gains.

For those who don't depend on preconf events, Parsiq must contend with The Graph and a sea of other players.

>Muh IQ protocol

NFT. Lending. Get outta here. The worst pivot in the history of pivots, maybe ever. Completely different token for some reason, probably to milk retail some more, with airdrops and staking for PRQ baggies as a consolation prize. There will be NFT lending in the future, but it won't be for the trash you bought with your life savings on OpenSea last year, and there will be far more mature, well-funded, and better connected players overseas facilitating the integration of tokenized offchain real assets with DeFi.

Alright, it's time to shut Parsnip shills the fuck up forever.

>Muh smart triggers

If Parsiq was valuable, every frontrunning bot, blockchain HFT, and data-intensive player in the space would be running on it. Fact of the matter is, programmatic preconf event triggers as a service aren't a particularly defensible or lucrative business, no matter how revolutionary Anatoly's approach to it is. "Do y the moment x happens onchain" is a relatively low-capital and commoditized value proposition.

This is why so many people do it in house, and why Parsiq has viable competitors. The company I'm at took the in-house approach because if instantaneous responses to events are mission critical, the latency between servers is a compounding performance liability. This concern for this niche use case applies to The Graph as well.

An example of a competitor in the event triggers space is EPNS/PUSH, decentralized and powered by The Graph of course, which has a similar market capitalization to Parsiq. We love them to death but nobody's under the illusion that they're a trillion dollar protocol, but /biz/ unfortunately has shills like Omega deluding Parsnips like lambs to the slaughter with hollow promises of such future gains.

For those who don't depend on preconf events, Parsiq must contend with The Graph and a sea of other players.

>Muh IQ protocol

NFT. Lending. Get outta here. The worst pivot in the history of pivots, maybe ever. Completely different token for some reason, probably to milk retail some more, with airdrops and staking for PRQ baggies as a consolation prize. There will be NFT lending in the future, but it won't be for the trash you bought with your life savings on OpenSea last year, and there will be far more mature, well-funded, and better connected players overseas facilitating the integration of tokenized offchain real assets with DeFi.

>>53670659
I'm a woman and I hate Kleros. 1c

>>53599910
Nice fud, virgin.
50 bn market cap would put hbar at rank 4 with a price of 3.50 USD per hbar. We're now at 7 Cents. That's a 50X and a relatively safe Investment

Blockchain Dev here. Let me explain to retards, like Omega, why Parsiq won't work:
Competition: There are already many established blockchain platforms and tools in the market, such as Ethereum, Hyperledger, and EOS, that offer similar features and solutions as Parsiq. This competition may make it difficult for Parsiq to gain traction and attract a large number of users.

Complexity: Parsiq's technology is based on blockchain and requires a good understanding of the underlying technology to be able to use it effectively. This complexity may discourage many businesses and individuals from adopting the platform.

Lack of awareness: Many businesses and individuals may not be familiar with Parsiq's technology and its benefits, which could limit its adoption. To overcome this challenge, Parsiq will need to invest in marketing and education initiatives to raise awareness of its platform and its features.

Security concerns: Blockchain technology is still relatively new, and there are concerns about its security and stability. Until these concerns are fully addressed, many businesses may be hesitant to adopt blockchain-based solutions like Parsiq.

Cost: Implementing and using Parsiq's technology can be expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller businesses and individuals. To overcome this challenge, Parsiq will need to offer affordable solutions and pricing options.

In conclusion, Parsiq's technology may face several challenges that could limit its adoption, such as competition, complexity, lack of awareness, security concerns, and cost.

Heyyyyyy, it's ya girl and I'm here to talk about Parsiq. But here's the thing, I don't think it's gonna take off. And let me tell you why.

First up, competition is fierce. There are already a ton of blockchain platforms out there, like Ethereum and EOS, that offer similar features and solutions. So, why would anyone choose Parsiq over the others?

Second, it's just too complex. Parsiq is built on blockchain technology, which can be confusing for even the tech-savvy among us. So, how are regular businesses and individuals supposed to use it effectively?

Third, not enough people know about it. Parsiq is still a relatively unknown platform and unless it becomes a household name, adoption is going to be slow.

Fourth, security is still a big concern with blockchain. Until these fears are put to rest, it's going to be hard for Parsiq to convince businesses to trust their sensitive data to the platform.

And finally, the cost. Implementing and using Parsiq's technology can be expensive and that's just not feasible for smaller businesses and individuals.

So, there you have it, folks. I don't think Parsiq's technology is going to take off. But hey, that's just my two cents. What do you think? Let me know in the comments!

Blockchain Dev here. Let me explain to retards, like Omega, why Parsiq won't work:
Competition: There are already many established blockchain platforms and tools in the market, such as Ethereum, Hyperledger, and EOS, that offer similar features and solutions as Parsiq. This competition may make it difficult for Parsiq to gain traction and attract a large number of users.

Complexity: Parsiq's technology is based on blockchain and requires a good understanding of the underlying technology to be able to use it effectively. This complexity may discourage many businesses and individuals from adopting the platform.

Lack of awareness: Many businesses and individuals may not be familiar with Parsiq's technology and its benefits, which could limit its adoption. To overcome this challenge, Parsiq will need to invest in marketing and education initiatives to raise awareness of its platform and its features.

Security concerns: Blockchain technology is still relatively new, and there are concerns about its security and stability. Until these concerns are fully addressed, many businesses may be hesitant to adopt blockchain-based solutions like Parsiq.

Cost: Implementing and using Parsiq's technology can be expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller businesses and individuals. To overcome this challenge, Parsiq will need to offer affordable solutions and pricing options.

In conclusion, Parsiq's technology may face several challenges that could limit its adoption, such as competition, complexity, lack of awareness, security concerns, and cost.

Blockchain Dev here. Let me explain to retards, like Omega, why Parsiq won't work:
Competition: There are already many established blockchain platforms and tools in the market, such as Ethereum, Hyperledger, and EOS, that offer similar features and solutions as Parsiq. This competition may make it difficult for Parsiq to gain traction and attract a large number of users.

Complexity: Parsiq's technology is based on blockchain and requires a good understanding of the underlying technology to be able to use it effectively. This complexity may discourage many businesses and individuals from adopting the platform.

Lack of awareness: Many businesses and individuals may not be familiar with Parsiq's technology and its benefits, which could limit its adoption. To overcome this challenge, Parsiq will need to invest in marketing and education initiatives to raise awareness of its platform and its features.

Security concerns: Blockchain technology is still relatively new, and there are concerns about its security and stability. Until these concerns are fully addressed, many businesses may be hesitant to adopt blockchain-based solutions like Parsiq.

Cost: Implementing and using Parsiq's technology can be expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller businesses and individuals. To overcome this challenge, Parsiq will need to offer affordable solutions and pricing options.

In conclusion, Parsiq's technology may face several challenges that could limit its adoption, such as competition, complexity, lack of awareness, security concerns, and cost.

feels like Parsiq and Kleros will be the biggest gainers in the upcoming bull run.

Parsiq is a blockchain platform that uses smart triggers and advanced automation to protect users from digital asset fraud and security threats. It offers a range of services to its users, including automated fraud detection, real-time transaction monitoring, and dispute resolution. Parsiq also provides a platform for developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain.

Kleros is a decentralized dispute resolution platform that uses game theoretic incentives to find impartial jurors to resolve disputes. It uses a unique system of tokens that are staked by participants in the dispute resolution process, which creates an incentive for jurors to vote fairly and accurately. Kleros also provides a range of services to its users, such as secure document storage and secure voting.

The main difference between Parsiq and Kleros is their respective focuses. Parsiq is focused on the protection and security of digital assets, while Kleros is focused on dispute resolution. Both platforms have the potential to be major gainers in the upcoming bull run, but the one that will benefit most depends on the particular needs of the investor.

feels like Parsiq and Kleros will be the biggest gainers in the upcoming bull run.

Parsiq is a blockchain platform that uses smart triggers and advanced automation to protect users from digital asset fraud and security threats. It offers a range of services to its users, including automated fraud detection, real-time transaction monitoring, and dispute resolution. Parsiq also provides a platform for developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain.

Kleros is a decentralized dispute resolution platform that uses game theoretic incentives to find impartial jurors to resolve disputes. It uses a unique system of tokens that are staked by participants in the dispute resolution process, which creates an incentive for jurors to vote fairly and accurately. Kleros also provides a range of services to its users, such as secure document storage and secure voting.

The main difference between Parsiq and Kleros is their respective focuses. Parsiq is focused on the protection and security of digital assets, while Kleros is focused on dispute resolution. Both platforms have the potential to be major gainers in the upcoming bull run, but the one that will benefit most depends on the particular needs of the investor.

It feels like Parsiq and Kleros will be the biggest gainers in the upcoming bull run.

Parsiq is a blockchain platform that uses smart triggers and advanced automation to protect users from digital asset fraud and security threats. It offers a range of services to its users, including automated fraud detection, real-time transaction monitoring, and dispute resolution. Parsiq also provides a platform for developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain.

Kleros is a decentralized dispute resolution platform that uses game theoretic incentives to find impartial jurors to resolve disputes. It uses a unique system of tokens that are staked by participants in the dispute resolution process, which creates an incentive for jurors to vote fairly and accurately. Kleros also provides a range of services to its users, such as secure document storage and secure voting.

The main difference between Parsiq and Kleros is their respective focuses. Parsiq is focused on the protection and security of digital assets, while Kleros is focused on dispute resolution. Both platforms have the potential to be major gainers in the upcoming bull run, but the one that will benefit most depends on the particular needs of the investor.

It feels like Parsiq and Kleros will be the biggest gainers in the upcoming bull run.

Parsiq is a blockchain platform that uses smart triggers and advanced automation to protect users from digital asset fraud and security threats. It offers a range of services to its users, including automated fraud detection, real-time transaction monitoring, and dispute resolution. Parsiq also provides a platform for developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain.

Kleros is a decentralized dispute resolution platform that uses game theoretic incentives to find impartial jurors to resolve disputes. It uses a unique system of tokens that are staked by participants in the dispute resolution process, which creates an incentive for jurors to vote fairly and accurately. Kleros also provides a range of services to its users, such as secure document storage and secure voting.

The main difference between Parsiq and Kleros is their respective focuses. Parsiq is focused on the protection and security of digital assets, while Kleros is focused on dispute resolution. Both platforms have the potential to be major gainers in the upcoming bull run, but the one that will benefit most depends on the particular needs of the investor.

It feels like Parsiq and Kleros will be the biggest gainers in the upcoming bull run.

Parsiq is a blockchain platform that uses smart triggers and advanced automation to protect users from digital asset fraud and security threats. It offers a range of services to its users, including automated fraud detection, real-time transaction monitoring, and dispute resolution. Parsiq also provides a platform for developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain.

Kleros is a decentralized dispute resolution platform that uses game theoretic incentives to find impartial jurors to resolve disputes. It uses a unique system of tokens that are staked by participants in the dispute resolution process, which creates an incentive for jurors to vote fairly and accurately. Kleros also provides a range of services to its users, such as secure document storage and secure voting.

The main difference between Parsiq and Kleros is their respective focuses. Parsiq is focused on the protection and security of digital assets, while Kleros is focused on dispute resolution. Both platforms have the potential to be major gainers in the upcoming bull run, but the one that will benefit most depends on the particular needs of the investor.

It feels like Parsiq and Kleros will be the biggest gainers in the upcoming bull run.

Parsiq is a blockchain platform that uses smart triggers and advanced automation to protect users from digital asset fraud and security threats. It offers a range of services to its users, including automated fraud detection, real-time transaction monitoring, and dispute resolution. Parsiq also provides a platform for developers to build decentralized applications (dApps) on its blockchain.

Kleros is a decentralized dispute resolution platform that uses game theoretic incentives to find impartial jurors to resolve disputes. It uses a unique system of tokens that are staked by participants in the dispute resolution process, which creates an incentive for jurors to vote fairly and accurately. Kleros also provides a range of services to its users, such as secure document storage and secure voting.

The main difference between Parsiq and Kleros is their respective focuses. Parsiq is focused on the protection and security of digital assets, while Kleros is focused on dispute resolution. Both platforms have the potential to be major gainers in the upcoming bull run, but the one that will benefit most depends on the particular needs of the investor.