/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54821085
bro why do you keep dragging Nova into this? why do those faggots live rent-free in your head?

>he created something.
what exactly has he created? I can take a shit and say I've created something, but it doesn't automatically give it value. show me the value Ed has created! where is it?

>You're using logical fallacies to support your non-argument and slinging shit without contributing anything of value (what Nova does best). Imagine having the audacity to accuse others of sucking people off when you simp for your entirely useless bathhouse of socially retarded spergs on a near-daily basis.
again, try and ignore the Novaposting for one second because you're apparently obsessed with them... dunnno why but OK... show me what value Ed has created. you're pretty confident in your argument and support of him, so it shouldn't be much of a problem to point the rest of us toward all this value Ed has given LUNC. go ahead, I'll wait.

>Use those brown eyes and scan the whitepaper, even if you can't read it. Put 2 and 2 together. What does nova bring to the table again? Oh, right.
Nova is useless and retarded. Ed is useless and a grifter. both can be true at the same time. now what? and you've still not addressed my main point: why would Ed come to LUNC with his AI chain if he had a value asset and could easily secure millions of dollars elsewhere? logic dictates he's either doing it because he wants to help LUNC (fat chance!), or because his AI project is trash and he couldn't secure funding elsewhere. no other explanation makes sense.

>If you don't grasp that all of this shit was intentional so accumulation could take place, you're fucking naive.
maybe, but I'm not the one simping for a failed academic who mismanaged 2 orgs and murdered all hype with the 0.2% tax reduction nonsense. maybe I'm naive, but you're a certified retard.