/biz/ - Business & Finance

?

>>13924461
>>13924409
>>13924507
anon is right. t. comp sci guy who read the sheet, minored in econ and almost minored in statistics except for a single course.

It's a very solid way to aggregate data outside of the ethereum network, or any other network.

>>13924442
>>13924659
this is the dumbest shit i've seen on biz in years. holy christ do some sort of self-thinking

>>13924599
you're likely right. however, i'm willing to see as an experiment how POS works. I don't think it's great for mining purposes, but I like it for LINK where it's a penalty for providing data.

Also, good thinking on your last paragraph. ETH, even though it is super rough around the edges, has all the developer momntum (largest, active community) which is colossally important. ETH will be the winner here.

>>13924652
LINK is not a better version of ETH because ETH is a smart contract platform; link just provides data. Two totally different platforms.

>>13923710
It's for LINK, not ETH. Imagine 2000 nodes providing data to 1 contract. Normally it would cost 0.50-1.50$ * the number of nodes (2000). That would mean a single contract would cause 1000$-3000$ in gas fees per contract.

With the new system, it would aggregate *outside of ETH* using a mathmatically proven method, and then send that single response for a single gas price of 0.50.

>>13924014
based anon who understands himself and doesn't ask the most retarded fucking questions like (will this work for BAT)

>>13924198
dummy the payment literally is the same method as the fufillment, which is called by any oracle request as a callback method.

>>13925815
it doesnt help ETH scale, bc they have their own network that has its own set of requirements.>>13924770
this is true. LINK can move to other networks but it will take almost the entirity of its existing development to move to another:

network
langauge
protocol

and require a new round of audits. ETH not scaling would be pretty bad.

>>13926518
i doubt the guy has braincells

>>9991274
>portfolio down 90%
>have a gf
never gonna make it,
you know which one you need to sell

and her

>>9286767
*sips*

*crashes link market*

>"oh hey there sweetie! thought you were going to make some money did you? haha xxxx"

>post yfw it's heavily pre-mined and centralized like cripple and some jew is going to dump his shekels after it moons

We all know we want flags, but I have another rule idea to make biz better. Two threads per coin/token. There are 7 or 8 Tortoisecoon threads right now while there are good threads getting buried by shit fingered rakeems

>>6723310
Would you hit it?

>>6646833
bull flag nigga

How much ETH do you want to pay her a visit?

I'm currently in transition between banks and haven't been able to get funds into gdax and binance. Anybody else still hoping the market tanks further and we can buy into it more cheaply?

invest in tether you moron , it actually survived the crash better than the rest of your shit coins and has much more room to moon this week

>>6594331
this

Pajeets in /biz/, pajeets in scancoins, pajeets in media. Fuck off pajeets.
Exhibit A:https://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/905914/bitcoin-price-latest-why-is-bitcoin-dropping-btc-exchange

>>6568371

This is the land whale the feedback is about:

How does this idiot still have a job?!?

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/16/cryptocurrency-sell-off-tether-faring-better-than-rest.html

>>6564394
I don't want your "help" pajeet

>>6554983
if youre going to anhero use two bullets plz

I love tea. Tea is such a delicious drink. What kind of tea do you like /biz/? I've been drinking some white tea lately that is just so so good.

*sips tea*

it seems like crypto is finally dead.

what is our next plan biz?

NEO or ETH

I am leaning towards NEO