/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30354085
> Assuming Schorr is activated, an atomic swap with XMR will look like a regular old transaction on the blockchain.

That is good.

> Also, XMR doesn't need to be laundered - it is the MEANS of laundering other coins.

If it is just a "means of laundering", then why would it outperform BTC in terms of price and adoption?

It will just be used for one thing - crime.

While BTC can be used for shitton of things.

>>30354175
If you want to be rich then it does not make sense to buy monero.

> Yes, because a ten year market is enough time to see such a thing. See you in ten years maxipad.

Goalpost moving.
My claim: "BTC is first mover". Is an measurable fact. It's binary. 1- first mover. 0-non first mover.

Your claim is that "ten year markets is not enough" which is vague non argument.
Because if it was 20 years, you could literally say the same.
If it was 5 years you could say the same.

> Most people trade in fiat. Crypto is exclusively a speculative investment rn. XMR has the utility needed to attract certain clients to it.
Yes, certain clients. I never said XMR does not serve a niche. I said it won't outperform BTC.

> BTC is losing marketshare to XMRs and other cryptos.

Not losing to XMR. I proved it in screen.

Second argument - BTC losing to other cryptos.
It isn't true. Pic related.

> Indeed. The people moving millions of dollars are retarded.

Yeah, exactly, which means if people can't move millions of dollars they also can't bump up the XMR price for it to ever become significant. You basically proved my point. Thank you.

> You do realize the majority of the world is not Amerca nor Western Europe right?

The majority of money is USA and Western Europe... AND CHINA.

And if China is strict on this shit.