/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54315892
However you slice it, I had one ETF which is the inverse of the other, so one can essentially consider the other to be somewhat an underlying asset. There is a specific point in which I "jump in" to the action, and one can more or less theorize that from that point, one direction is to my favor, and the other is not. As the underlying asset moves up and down, it passes my original jump in point. Again, theoretically, any movement towards the "good side" of that point should be green for me, yet over time, as the underlying asset swings up and down, my point of green adjusts slightly lower and lower.

No matter what you call that, no matter what all else is what, that occurs. Why? I do not know, I am not capable of more than very rudimentary maths and am disinclined to overly concern myself with details beyond the practically required, as I have already used up assuredly more than half of my lifetime and on top of that, my mental capabilities are even less now than they were within my twenties, thirty years ago, in many ways. Yet one can also say that there is a certain degree of higher intelligence/wisdom in knowing only that which one most needs to know in order to carry out one's desired tasks, or even handle tasks which present themselves against one's desire.

At any rate, this shit which I have just described, does your big sharp brain full of knowing have any idea what it's called if not volatility decay, being a decay in one's desired value over time while being acted upon by volatility? Surely you must also realize the irony of threatening to refer to someone else as a nigger while behaving as one does.