/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57971012
I've got 2M WLUNA or WLUNC in my Metamask but there's no point selling since it's worth hardly anything currently. I am more bullish on WLUNC than LUNC since the max total supply is much lower.

>>55506128
I think there's a better chance of something happening with WLUNA rather than LUNC, at this point. At least the max total supply of WLUNA is much smaller.

>>55126170
WLUNA

>>54259367
Price now slightly higher at +944.06%

Does Coinbase know something we don't?

>>53168421
I heard it was going to get pegged to the new LUNA, which for some reason still doesn't have an ERC-20 version.

>>53028429
>>53028746
>>53030316
>>53030395
>>53036101
I've been seeing this type of WLUNA/WLUNC FUD for months now. Sorry, but I'm not selling or converting my stack. Remember a few months ago that there was a intense FUD on this board about a bridge being closed and thus WLUNA becoming completely worthless? I simply hold and wait. The galaxy-brained play was to have a stack of both LUNC and WLUNC all along. The fact that WLUNC also has a WAY smaller max total supply than LUNC has always been bullish too.

>>51495933
I hope you're right.

>>51496031
WLUNC (or WLUNA) is LUNC (or LUNA) on the Ethereum blockchain.

>>51498309
I've noticed that as well. I thought it could be to do with the total supply of LUNC vs WLUNC?

>>51456188
Coinbase said WLUNA is not actually LUNA, but it is meant to represent LUNA's value.

>>51420209
WLUNA is pegged to and meant to track the price of LUNA, not LUNC. It is pegged to LUNA by name, and not some form of contract address.

>>51388814
And this. It's on their website WLUNA is not luna but a token meant to track the price of LUNA.