/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21739554
yeah its too bad the whole thing was mothballed before, what i read led me to believe it was the environmental regs that got them shut down before. Sounds like that wont be an issue this time, Im def going to watch them, but no sense tying up money for years in them when other miners are ready to produce/are producing.

Aurcana seems like they are only a couple months away from producing.

Havnt heard much from macewan though, wonder whats going on there?

>>21613917
>Maybe no but what about a 5 billion dollar one?

who knows? silver at 30 for a couple years or 50 by EOY, or even 100 they could go much higher... who the fuck knows?

I wouldn't count on it dropping below 18$ though

>>21613917
>but they had stock splits and created new shares
>would it be impossible for them to get back to those highs?

their 2011-2013 high was 43$, even if they go to 20$ thats more then 20x where they are right now.

It all depends on silver/gold (and zinc + other ores they sell too) price... if we hold at 18+ aurcana does ok and you make ok money, higher the price of PM's the better we will do.

>>21611018
not really, its just some faggot using multiple devices to keep shilling something that, at best, will go from 40 cents to 80 cents, or might just not produce at all and tank... they went from 3 mill shares to 78 mill shares in 2 years.

If you want good penny miners go with aurcana, they are actually going to produce, they have not been a dead flat line like bhll has for the last year, and the upwards potential is just so much higher.

If you want a safer but still profitable stock go with mux

>>21586562
stop shilling that shitty over diluted mining stock when there are better options for people... BHLL send from 3 mill shares to over 75 mill in 2 years... its not going to moon like aurcana or mux or any of pan mans picks might.

>>21538824
last i checked it was approx 2 years worth of entire worlds mining production

>>21537734
dude get the fuck in aurcana and mux before they moon.

BHLL is being shilled a lot but I am suspect because they diluted so much, its not going to moon as high as its being shilled to.

Not saying outright bhll will lose money, but I just dont see anything in the company to get me excited outside of "PM GO UP = MINERS GO UP" and there just seems like much better choices for miners.

threadly reminder to get on the physical and mining trains before they are gone.

>>21473982
why do you keep trying to pump this stock....
plenty of better options

>>21306089
miners always lag behind prices

Buy the dip ™

>mux earnings out
>everything is good
>increase target from 2$ to $2.50
>stock down 3%

buy the dip bros.....

I suspect aurcana will dip after blasting from the ~.68 to ~.91 range so fast, dont miss out.

>>21058591
miners do not trace PM price exactly. they are still fucked by shutdowns, and are priced in at 18$s and 1600$G.

Just look at the lag during the last bull run, and take this as an opportunity to buy the dip

>>21037082
still pretty good, I had to sell an oz of gold to buy 50oz of silver and mining stocks, bought back 1/2oz at spot of gold, so I dont feel too bad. Doubt I can accumulate much more gold at these prices, its 2700/oz in leafbux now...

You yanks should stack like there is no tomorrow, you are still getting the best deal in the world on it.

Miners are still at the train station, all aboard!

>>21028296
Prepping oxygen tank

get in before the train leaves anons....

>>21002834
they always lag behind spot, very good oportunity

I spent more on miners last couple weeks then on phys.

reminder to get into miners while you can, do some research, not you personal financial advisor

>>21001786
spend half on physical so you dont get fucked, and then HOLD it till 100.

spend the other half on pic related, those trains are still in the station. Hold the stocks till at least 4x

get in on miners before the train leaves.

Hold on to your phys as it rockets

>>20978414
yeah its in juniors with track records of producing, already at/near lows.

Able and willing to hold for years if I need to, which I probably will due to the 8-20month lag between spot taking off and miners taking off.

>>20954942
gota play long term with stonks... dont day trade.
Aurcana for the big risky gains
Mux for the less risky gains

but you see how it took like a year after exploding PM prices for both to go up? gotta hold.

>>20943566
>DO I BUY? SELL? BREATHE? WHAT DO I DOOOOOO?
>read the information in the op and do my own research? why the fuck would I do that?


Reminder to thread, these trains are still in the station, get while the getting is good.

>>20884773
I would excite your positions anon

aurcana has potential to go up many many fold

Mux is a safer bet, yet it too has the chance to go up many fold as well

Just looks at them during the last moon mission

>>20868854
? mine went up almost 9 and 5 %

get on the aurcana and mux trains before they leave the station anon... if we really have another 2008-2011 bull run in pms, they will likely perform just as they did the last time.

Personally I think this bull run will be much higher, even normie tier FA's are putting gold past 2k