/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21382589
>T. 2019 post mainnet nufag
whoa
mainnet was 935 days ago?
>>21382589
>you're a confused bitch
now the time travel thread makes more sense

>>21232211
>vitalik is an idealistic autist
it can be admirable in some regards
but it can devolve into pettiness with a quickness

>>21232235
>If link needs ETH2 to scale to work then it is DOA
link is blockchain agnostic

the cryptocurrency ecosystem needs scaling as a whole
baseline protocol is one method of tackling that problem

>>21232235
>Link has several proposed scaling solutions, but they all work equally well on ETH1 and ETH2.
you're right

>>21232235
>ETH2 is not going to solve any scaling issues
that's a problem, ETH has scaling issues and has growing pains
how has the development team approached the problem since it was evident during the time of "crypto kitties" in 2017?

>>20975936
>"but because MATH and PHYSICS will enforce the contract"

>>20821739
>mega corps are going to be shattered in the coming years
and that's a VERY GOOD THING
the biggest asset that chainlink has is that it's open source

look at windows vs. unix for example (they've tried to corrupt linux now with globo-homo)
but still, due to the open source nature of unix, it is a much more resilient system (it's a kind of pseudo-DAO)
>>20819018
>just missed Ari's presentation today since I was busy transferring my ethereum mining machines from windows to linux

chainlink has the same resiliency, despite the best efforts of the thieves and criminals like nexo and simp-peon

>>20630746
based edit
saved
thank you

>>20630714
>precious internet gigabytes

>>20630749
>NOOOO!!!
>NOT THE GIGABYTE-ERINOS!!!!
WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE GIGABYTES!!!

>>20361818

>>20334254
https://youtu.be/QVIQM4xYCn4
another "case of the Mondays"

>>20229786
>take a breather and listen instead
>we have time to get everyone up to speed
https://twitter.com/CrookedSmirks/status/1280326552694206470?s=20
>>20229786
>time to make the "guilty" into the "innocent"

>>20128257
>That's neat.
follow the digits and let me know what you think:
>>20128272

>>20128251
>bros is sergey the antichrist...
lol technically yes but not in the way you think
we are all the "anti-christ" until we are born again in Jesus Christ

>>20102145
1. New technologies will drive banking transformation over the next 5 years

A large majority of respondents to the survey (66%) cited new technologies as having the biggest impact in banking over the next five years. This represents a 57% increase from last year’s figure, which could reflect the impact of the Coronavirus crisis. Customer demands, shifting external environments and external competitors also featured. However, new technology provides the tools to fend off many of these issues – such as new competition from Big Tech.

One technology which has seen increased demand both from new entrants and established banks is Cloud and Software as a Service (SaaS). It has low infrastructure costs, lets products be created and changed quickly, and offers resilience, scalability and security. 84% of respondents believe that Cloud technology will be transformative in banking. Cloud also featured in the top three technology investment priorities for banks, with more than a quarter of executives naming it as a primary focus.

Cloud and SaaS has allowed banks to operate with an agility and speed usually associated with their fintech competitors. In just three weeks, Atlantic Union Bank in the US used a cloud-based SaaS solution to fund over $1.4bn in US Government Paycheck Protection Program loans for 6,500 businesses. EQ bank - Canada’s first digitally-born bank – has used the scalability of Cloud to meet the surge in digital demand and recently reach $3 billion in deposits.

>>17138548
https://youtu.be/ayzl2tarmz0

>>16705466
>like you couldn't do that using json.
do you even know that some data feeds are relying on sensors (calibration, functional redundancies, etc.)
before you can aggregate data, it is absolutely critical that you are sure of its accuracy and precision?
if it isn't then it defeats the entire point of using jsons in the first place

>>16534563

>>16514788
>You know only rich neets are the one studying this right?
>>16514788
>they are the only ones that can afford to waste their life on information thats useless
you're confusing effect for cause

>>16518066
https://youtu.be/8QSfl7HT9Go