[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.14790250 [View]
File: 379 KB, 800x800, 1555608595931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14790250

>>14790208
the rest of the board is hard pink wojacks right now, fighting to stay above 10K and not lose all their allowance money. Jerome and Donald are basically fucking them in the ass raw

we're at all time high and Jerome is on our side.
hope it answers your question

>> No.14121422 [View]
File: 379 KB, 800x800, 1555608595931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14121422

>>14121347
2008-2009 r*ddit was still OK. Nerds, few women. It wasn't cool or useful, but it wasn't harmful to the internet at large at that time.
It's own quality was ruined in 2010-2011 when norms, women, and marketers really started to roll in. 90% of r*ddit becomes unusable at this point. Then after that (2012-) these people started to turn their eyes towards the rest of the internet in a larger and more coordinated way.

I can't comment on pre-2018 /biz/ because it's the kind of board that I would see the catalog and move on

>>14121397
bank transfer, they would let me use my funds to buy normie-approved stocks and ETFs that same day but I can't buy dangerous things like VRUS ~

>> No.13470477 [View]
File: 379 KB, 800x800, 1555608595931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13470477

>>13470442
I'll take a guess that their earnings will be in-line, and they won't lower guidance as much as Intel. Which is (I assume) what Wall Street expects as well, so not too much price movement.

>>13470422
the first chart you posted shows all indicators moving the way they were in late 2016, into 2017. If you're in a cautious mood, which I agree in, did you see that in the chart you posted or is there something bearish in that chart I'm not seeing?

>> No.13427428 [View]
File: 379 KB, 800x800, 1555608595931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13427428

>>13427353
no idea lol
honestly I'd probably understand some of the underlying technologies of these companies better than their revenue streams and price movement. With these technology companies there is so much complexity in keeping track of the company, everything it does, everything the competitors are doing.
That's why I like investing in food :)

>>13427371
They'll make the insurance cheaper based on analysis of the driver, and then eventually make it even cheaper with self-driving.
That's the plan anyway.
and even by saying this they can sell more cars now, and sell more cars later when they deliver.
so it seems like a good move.

They also need to figure out how self-driving vehicle insurance will work eventually (legal standpoint). so they had to walk this path now anyway. (assisted driving insurance, but still the 'driver' is the one insured)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]