/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24037776

>>23963624
Here: >>23901472
And now back to plebbit.

>>14972374
>Every bit as political as wiki, in fact more.
No, why is not paypal run for free by volunteers?
>Number pulled out your ass.
So where is the cost analysis from Nano foundation for 100 000 TPS? Have any of you Nano investors ever done a simple cost analysis? You invest large sums in a project where you don't even know and understand the basics and the foundation keep you completely in the dark? That's gambling, not investing.

>>14265160
>Bunch of fucking bullshit
>Go kys
Nice. Typical and expected Nano "rebuttal".

5k transformed into $300

>>12619848
You have no argument. How will that "prove" that Nano is legit? Bitconnect had better connections with the Banking infrastructure.

How do you explain this:
BAKKT mentions 40 cryptos, Nano is not one of them. Coinbase will not touch Nano hit by another major lawsuit.
https://www.theice.com/market-data/connectivity-and-feeds/consolidated-feed/coverage-list/cryptocurrencies

BAKKT mentions 40 cryptos, Nano is not one of them. Coinbase will not touch Nano hit by another major lawsuit.
https://www.theice.com/market-data/connectivity-and-feeds/consolidated-feed/coverage-list/cryptocurrencies

>>12587858
For months they did absolutely nothing. After being pressured they matched the money from the victims up to one million dollars under the condition that they would only go after bomber and stay far away from Nano devs corrupt and highly unethical l behaviour. See
https://archive.is/Wkgvn

>>12572113
The crazy Nanoids never address anything. There is so much lies, corruption and smoke surrounding that shitcoin. Only response I get to my documented criticism of Nano is verbal abuse and you nanoids just flagging my comments. Do you have any idea how that looks for potential investors?

>>12468987
Always fun to see how you nanoids always compare nano to BTC. The future global cryptocurrency will have to be fully decentralized. Nano can't do that, regardless of how you speculate about the future of BTC, something which is completely irrelevant.

>>12359703
>Hahah POW got updated last version to address this.
Sure dude. Show me where they solved the spam attack risk vector. Do it, fool.

>>11950286
>this has been done, you just do not accept it and continue to spam your pasta
Absolute bullshit.

Crypto will moon again and I'll show them

WHY DOES THIS SHITCOIN KEEP FUCKING BLEEDING?

I just sold my bags, now BTC HAS TO OUTPERFORM THIS SHIT OR I AM JUSTED BEYONG REPARATION

>>9538330

Only redditors Nano holders cultists are getting JUSTed right now, as they deserve.

Is there any actual science to trading or do they just sell and cross fingers hoping it goes down and buy hoping it goes up?

>>9465669
>he fell for the pump and dump

Never dummy, good luck with your permanent bagholding.

I only have 350$ on crypto (NANO)
Should I go all in on ChainLINK if I want to make it?

>thinking that doubling your investment in a year is a good thing in crypto

Why did everything go wrong after the rebrand
Would a rebrand after the bitgrail situation have saved it?

I sold the bottom

IT WAS SUPPOSED TO REPLACED BITCOIN

>b-b-but rebranding was supposed to fix this!