[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.18877211 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, E78343D6-A05C-4E24-A1B4-B8214EC119F0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18877211

>>18875536
Yayy staking my own collateral as an incentive to remain honest but no guaranteed payout. Nice just went ALL IN

>> No.18843791 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, 1588469608763.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18843791

>>18842912
>>18843162
>>18843195
>>18843199
>>18843245
>>18843293
>>18843328
>>18843371
>>18843385
>>18843392
>>18843506
>>18843524
>>18843524
>>18843771

Expect nothing pic related.

>> No.18843184 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, 1588469608763.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18843184

>>18841489
>>18841510
>>18841505
>>18841492
>92▶
>ZCN
>>18841492
>>18841525
>>18841585
>>18841648
>>18841634
>>18841660
>>18841677
>>18841721
>>18841691
>>18841726
>>18841758
>>18841790
>>18841805
>>18841847
>>18841878
>>18841889
>>18841894
>>18841916
>>18841919
>>18841922
>>18841923
>>18841940
>>18841954
>>18841959
>
>>18841967
>>18841992
>>18842023
>>18842035
>>18842060
>>18842588
>18842588
>>18842595
>>18842600
>>18843114
>>18843096
>>18843154
>>18843155
Expect nothing pic related. Get out while you can.

>> No.18832490 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, 7A475D1D-DAE5-4D53-8EB5-B9C465CC87BB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18832490

>>18776886

>>18827207

All these years we have all had doubts about LINK and how it’s a probable soft exit scam. I have always been more on the side that it was legit due to partnerships high profile entities. Now that makes it seem even more scammy after these last few days.

Just read the threads for yourself and do your due diligence. I won’t comment on this post so samefag me with insults all you want instead of proving you’re not scam artists. Possibly the last post you’ll see from me on 4chan. I can’t kept subjecting myself to this echochamber trying to help. That’s why you don’t see FUD and only shills. We give up because there’s no point in trying. It’s exhausting going back and forth with the same group of people samefagging coordinating efforts to attack your credibility while backing each other up to make you guys believe there are numbers on their side.

Anons, link any other relevant posts that can help each other sift fact from fiction. This post will have 5-10 people attacking my credibility immediately while supporting each other and LINK. That’s coordinated scamming. Peace anons

>> No.18831638 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, 642894B7-A6D0-4DF8-A19A-2E1991DC25CF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18831638

>>18827298
Expect nothing pic related

>> No.18785039 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, 35A009A0-F137-4C13-8A85-4721D0D435D7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18785039

>>18784918
>>18785006
>>18784851
>>18785018
A.3 Discussion
OCA introduces a few design challenges that we briefly discuss here.
Payment for honest nodes. Unfortunately, while it penalizes freeloaders with non-payment, OCA is not able to guarantee conversely that honest nodes are paid. Indeed, even in the benign case where no nodes are faulty, unlucky message ordering can result in honest nodes that have contributed partial signatures to Σ not receiving payment.
This problem could be addressed in part by making Alg. 2 synchronous. Specifi- cally, “Wait” steps could require that nodes wait a period of time ∆ such that receipt of messages from honest nodes is guaranteed. In this case, all nodes with partial signatures incorporated into Σ would be guaranteed payment. Side effects, however, would be slower execution and the challenge of setting ∆ correctly.
The problem of designing an asynchronous protocol with strong payment guaran- tees is an open research problem that we are currently exploring.

>> No.18784850 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, 501713F0-DC15-4760-9F3C-7B0C353CEA5A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18784850

>>18784456
Lol like I’ve said, I don’t care if some of you don’t believe me. After a week of me posting, most everybody with actual knowledge and understanding of crypto will realize I know what I’m talking about. I have no agenda here.

Do you really think I care if a few random people on the internet believe that I am lying about buying Chainlink and printing it at $0.15? Hahahahahaha dude cmon I’m truly trying to help you guys. I have free time due to quarantine so I figured why not

>> No.18784559 [View]
File: 287 KB, 750x1334, F3D12439-F1B5-4D73-94A4-689AB2598861.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18784559

“A.3 Discussion
OCA introduces a few design challenges that we briefly discuss here.
Payment for honest nodes. **Unfortunately, while it penalizes freeloaders with non-payment, OCA is not able to guarantee conversely that honest nodes are paid. ** Indeed, even in the benign case where no nodes are faulty, unlucky message ordering can result in honest nodes that have contributed partial signatures to Σ not receiving payment.
This problem could be addressed in part by making Alg. 2 synchronous. Specifically, “Wait” steps could require that nodes wait a period of time ∆ such that receipt of messages from honest nodes is guaranteed. In this case, all nodes with partial signatures incorporated into Σ would be guaranteed payment. Side effects, however, would be slower execution and the challenge of setting ∆ correctly.
The problem of designing an asynchronous protocol with strong payment guarantees is an open research problem that we are currently exploring.“


https://link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]