/biz/ - Business & Finance

Honestly, if any of you guys fall for this shitty thread and buy SDL instead of carving out time in your schedule to get into General access at https://staking.chain.link/ when v0.2 pools open up, you deserve to miss out and only get shit rewards since you're sharing the 5.25% rewards with EVERYONE staking through the stake.link platform and it's not scaled to 5.25% of the Link you stake.

Those of us who staked through the community staking pool are nearing 300 Link for 7K staked, same can't be said for SDL stakers.

>>52805494
>What is divorce?


> SOCIETY HAD THIS SHIT ALREADY FIGURED OUT ALREADY.
SOCIETY HAD THIS SHIT ALREADY FIGURED OUT ALREADY.
> SOCIETY HAD THIS SHIT ALREADY FIGURED OUT ALREADY.

Divorces weren't anywhere near as accessible nowadays because No fault divorce was not a thing. Marriages were valued highly and women were pressured to get married in their early 20's. Premarital sex was heavily discouraged to the point where businesses had rules in to incentivized getting married and discourage other behavior; hotels not allowing a non married male and female couple to get a room together is proof of this. Imagine if Airbnb denied access to non married couples, think of all that profit risking being left on the table and how much it would pressure travelers to be married.

Once again, I repeat:

SOCIETY HAD THIS SHIT ALREADY FIGURED OUT ALREADY.
> SOCIETY HAD THIS SHIT ALREADY FIGURED OUT ALREADY.
SOCIETY HAD THIS SHIT ALREADY FIGURED OUT ALREADY.


Society was designed from both a cultural and regulatory standpoint to incentivize marriage. When you take away those constructs, you're left with a crisis of single mothers fucking up society and making things worse for everyone.

>>28529712
If they didn't spend BTC and actively use the BTC network as a banking system, we would have never gotten to this point.

This topic is as retarded people complaining about not buying into the BTC 10 years ago when they heard about it. They didn't understand the project then, and you clearly don't understand importance of the past events now.

>>26120155
You dumbass get back in. Staking hasn't even been announced yet. $1K is FUD.

>>24918397
> rushed a simple copy paste

Why do they expect me to feel sorry for the guy here? I always check over my address 3 times over and you can look at the first 3 and last digits of your address to make sure it's the same.

I will admit, the one time I nearly screwed up, it wasn't really a screw up as I sent crypto on the main network and had my metamask set to Ropsten so I panicked for a moment thinking I lost my crypto.

>>22150345
It says to me that most people altogether, regardless of when they came into the project, don't understand just how valuable these tokens are and the scope of the project.

Or people are just that fucking weak sauce. OP, you are going to fucking regret it if you decide 2 million is enough for you.

We begged, pleaded, and had tons of threads discussing the potential of the project and had tons of threads informing you of its developments and partnerships damn nearly daily. You ignored all of this but listened to halfassed FUD like "The project only has 2 developers and is headed by a philosophy major!"

I don't feel sorry for you at all.

>>18652335
>He's right. Some day you too will grow out of this phase and realize what a fucking idiot you have been.

If you ever profited off information relayed to you from /biz/ know that you're a fucking hypocrite. If you haven't made any money thanks to this shithole then WTF ARE YOU DOING?

The reason why 4chan is so good at finding true and verified information is because of its brutal culture and anonymity where only your ideas and content can give you attention. The fact that you're anonymous means that without a Tripcode, you have to constantly produce something of value if you want to keep gaining respect and acknowledgement.

The twat in OP's tweet wasted his life away on mindless boards on 4chan. That's his ass. If he wanted to learn about the outdoors, there's /out/. If he wanted to learn amount high level math and sciences, there's /sci/. If he wanted to learn about crypto, there's this board. Instead he probably wasted his life away on /b/ and /v/ where you learn jack shit because the topics are extremely easy to digest, accessible to low IQ peeps.

Oh my god this topic is such a shitshow. Fucking nulinkers ruining everything.

>>17447212
Not gonna make it.

The Link community was only as big as it is today because of the camaraderie of bizraelis. Get off your stinkin' giraffe.

>>17341973
>I regret it so much but it's a needle in a haystack type of thing, i was sure it was just another shill thing.

When I first came to this board and heard about what it did and learned about Ethereum and what smartcontracts could do, I went all in. And subsequently ran into more articles and breadcrumbs reaffirming my decision multiple times a week.

It absolutely wasn't a need in a haystack type of thing. You weren't paying attention, you didn't understand the scope of the project, and you still haven't since you haven't dropped a dime on the project even now.

>>16389901
>>Having kids, and especially a daughter in 2019 is the ULTIMATE cuckoldry

Of all dumb things to say, how did this thought manifest?

>>15631429
You're on a business and investing board in a topic where one guy is literally making the ultimate sacrifice in lifestyle so he can save money and you're busy showing off how you have a girl to waste money on and bang.

Have you ever heard of the term, "situational awareness"?

>>15326954
Anon, don't be a creeper, please?

We all are starstruck by the dude and the Chainlink team, but you don't need to be THAT obvious about it. They're all still human.

>>15118154
No you idiot. The anonymity and lack standardized tools to individualize your identity or gain attention other than the content and ideas you bring to the table is exactly why we have such a diversity of ideas and attract insiders that break the news about so many different things, among them, Link. You can't foster such a large community on Reddit that enables and encourages group think.

>>13379918
>>13379939
>>13379968
>>13380003

Just what are you trying to accomplish here? There's literally a video here >>13379753
that talks about research findings about how men with little sexual access go haywire and get violent on women either via sperging out like Elliott Rodgers or flat out sexually assaulting them like in countries with low access to sexual outlets and high male to female ratios.

Just what are you trying to accomplish by shaming guys here? All you're going to do is contribute to the stereotype and it'll come back to haunt women in the worst ways possible.

>>12847138
Most people aren't trained to be able to handle BASICALLY THEIR ENTIRE FAMILIES DYING ON THEM anon.

>>7622166
Delete this immediately