/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50104669
I 100% believe on BTC, ETH, and other networks support cross-chain NFT minting, trading, and transfers

>>12936130
You don't have to trust the chainlink network, thats the fucking point (TRUSTLESS). Its guaranteed because node operators put up their money saying they're going to deliver the data correctly from source A to your smart contract, and you can have multiple nodes so any attack or potential of failure getting the data from the source YOU CHOOSE to your smart contract is guaranteed 24/7. If a node operator provides false data, there are x number of other nodes looking at the same source of data YOU CHOSE and because they don't know each other they are incentivized to provide the correct data for stinky linky rewards from the network. If your data doesn't match the others, you will be penalized by giving up a portion of your staked collateral.

But just to break it down for you brainlets, you can trust the network because the cryptographic technology of blockchain makes it possible via protocol level consensus algorithms.

>>12405282
It could be a good way for Sergey to reveal the partnerships and others looking to use the network. Perhaps the big fortune 500 companies wanting to use the network don't want to say "we're relying on this 2 man start-up for the future of our data networks" but will when/if this happens. Interesting theory.

I'm gonna be at the event. Any good questions to ask if this does occur?

bump

The order book on BTC/LINK on binance is looking a little thin. How many stinkies does binance even have?

>>11585749
I'm number 3. I might go grab some whiskey to celebrate.

$1,000 EOY

>>11491792
Thanks anon

>>11481422
The token is also erc-677 with a special function to make the data call between nodes so it is required for the network to function.

2500 EOY