/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57178311
protip : delete few pics from your anime memefolder to free extra space for more silver bars.

>>56381611
>we went from having precious metal in our 5 cents coins, down to having 5c withdrawn from circulation because no common metal is cheap enough to justify the face value, and you can't buy anything with 5c anyway
>in less than a century
wew

https://files.enderman.ch/scripts/yt-antiadblocker.txt

>>49373866
Lots of text, literally 2 real points, all of them dogshit and most unrelated because you just copy pasted. I'll bite thought because I'm actually an autistic retard who can't stand things not being as they supposed to be:

>(or maybe even more chains they'll add to the primary network)
You fundamentally can't add unlimited main chains, all of them would need to talk to one another which works with 3-maybe-10 chains but if you want to scale you need 1000+ chains which, duh, doesn't work with their architecture but this is the first time I heard someone talk about it and whoever wrote that is clearly clinically retarded, so I shouldn't have gone autismo on that one line.
>will burn AVAX and reduce the supply.
lazy copy paste job we are not talking about this
>The primary network is likely to take all of the DeFi activity
The C chain? The one chain which is already proving that avax's claims of anything +50 tps (while having low fees) are a lie?
>(Subnets are mostly for gaming/CLOBs/IOT etc).
>The C-Chain will act as the main settlement layer for Rollups too,
unrelated nonsense written by someone who doesn't even know how avax works.
>i hold AVAX in addition to Ether is because i believe it has a very strong case for acting as popular settlement layer
It really does not, it's an unscalable VC pump and dump and is not reliable enough to be a settlement layer for anything let alone shitty dog tokens.

>>Many subnets, especially those who care about decentralisation, will use AVAX as gas token because it's far easier to incentivise validators with AVAX instead of unattractive native token they use for their dapp
I love this, "they will have to use AVAX because maybe it will be better for validators, y-yes they don't have to but they might :DD"
Absolute cope, the purest copium I've tasted today
> can and probably will demand payment in AVAX
Probably, fucking kek

Stop frogposting you fucking clown.

>>49280499
This, I will break it down for brainlets.

>point 1
irrelevant
>point 2
200 devs managed to create a proof of stake based web hosting service? that's it? there is a scam project called flux that also has a hosting service the same way ICP does, it was made by complete retarded losers, I would expect 200 devs to come up with the best L1 in the world but they might as well just have forked bitshares.
>point 3
irrelevant
>point 4
irrelevant, plus VCs owning 80% is not something you do if you care about longevity
>point 5
vaporware and it's not going to happen
>point 6
I don't think social media will ever be able to run on a crypto platform. The business model is fundamentally about consuming your privacy, at huge scales, to sell you ads. You'd be working against the tech platform to attempt to implement that. Also, personally, social media is a plague that needs to be regulated out of existence. In 100 years, I doubt it will still be around.
>point 7
irrelevant, already exists
>point 8
what the fuck is this, irrelevant.
>point 9
while losing security, i.e. not scalable at all, I can spin up 1000 ethereum forks tomorrow and that's not scaling because It's missing validators that will secure the network.
>point 10
No BTC being on a centralized PoS chain is not like LN

>>49280581
ICP is more centralized than AWS. Really think about that.

>>49280533
when will you kill yourself