[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.6981364 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, VvW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6981364

WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?!?!?!?!?

>> No.6627203 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6627203

vechain vs waltonchain, which is better?

>> No.6036614 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6036614

Guys can we seriously discuss these 3 and the differences?

Balls deep into Ven and i think it has a bright future especially if the PBoC RUMORS are true.

>> No.6034476 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, jio0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6034476

Waltonchain vs VeChain - who wins?

Don't know which bags to sell, and which bags to accumulate more of.

>> No.5740027 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5740027

Can we settle this without memes? Whos better and why?

>> No.5584459 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5584459

Walton has a huge advantage over VET. They have patents on the txid reading rfids, so they can implement their blockchain on the foundational layer, through the rfids. VET has to implement through API on the application layer through business centralized control. Because of this, Walton is more secure and decentralized. Walton is also cheaper to implement because they make their own chips. VeChain outsources their chips. Walton is a world-leader in chip technology, and has many big partnerships and govt contracts.

VeChain is fine. But Walton is technologically superior. I don't think anyone here actually debates that. The debate is really over marketing. Walton doesn't market like VeChain does because Walton is B2B while VeChain is B2C. They will both be successful, but Walton's scope is much larger.

Actually, ironically, Walton is better at anti-counterfeiting, which is VeChain's main objective, because there is no human intervention when writing to the blockchain due to how walton is implemented through the foundational layer and since VeChain is implemented through API. Walton allows for true authentication.

But like I said. VET is fine. It's just flashier than Walton and it's getting a lot of attention because of that. Under the hood, Walton has a lot going for it.

>> No.5539203 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5539203

Walton has a huge advantage over VET. They have patents on the txid reading rfids, so they can implement their blockchain on the foundational layer, through the rfids. VET has to implement through API on the application layer through business centralized control. Because of this, Walton is more secure and decentralized. Walton is also cheaper to implement because they make their own chips. VeChain outsources their chips. Walton is a world-leader in chip technology, and has many big partnerships and govt contracts.

VeChain is fine. But Walton is technologically superior. I don't think anyone here actually debates that. The debate is really over marketing. Walton doesn't market like VeChain does because Walton is B2B while VeChain is B2C. They will both be successful, but Walton's scope is much larger.

Actually, ironically, Walton is better at anti-counterfeiting, which is VeChain's main objective, because there is no human intervention when writing to the blockchain due to how walton is implemented through the foundational layer and since VeChain is implemented through API. Walton allows for true authentication.

But like I said. VET is fine. It's just flashier than Walton and it's getting a lot of attention because of that. Under the hood, Walton has a lot going for it.

Walton even got more partnerships:

<https://www.reddit.com/r/waltonchain/comments/7jyyli/summary_of_some_of_waltonchains_government_and/

<https://www.investinblockchain.com/top-5-cryptocurrencies-2018/

>> No.5539159 [View]
File: 149 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5539159

Walton has a huge advantage over VET. They have patents on the txid reading rfids, so they can implement their blockchain on the foundational layer, through the rfids. VET has to implement through API on the application layer through business centralized control. Because of this, Walton is more secure and decentralized. Walton is also cheaper to implement because they make their own chips. VeChain outsources their chips. Walton is a world-leader in chip technology, and has many big partnerships and govt contracts.

VeChain is fine. But Walton is technologically superior. I don't think anyone here actually debates that. The debate is really over marketing. Walton doesn't market like VeChain does because Walton is B2B while VeChain is B2C. They will both be successful, but Walton's scope is much larger.

Actually, ironically, Walton is better at anti-counterfeiting, which is VeChain's main objective, because there is no human intervention when writing to the blockchain due to how walton is implemented through the foundational layer and since VeChain is implemented through API. Walton allows for true authentication.

But like I said. VET is fine. It's just flashier than Walton and it's getting a lot of attention because of that. Under the hood, Walton has a lot going for it.

Walton even got more partnerships:
https://www.reddit.com/r/waltonchain/comments/7jyyli/summary_of_some_of_waltonchains_government_and/

https://www.investinblockchain.com/top-5-cryptocurrencies-2018/

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]