/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9852681
If this is correct, it's not such a big issue.

The amount of security/tamper proof-ness you require is likely to be proportional to the value of the smart contract. If your smart contract is for $1Bn of bonds then you're going to want as many nodes fetching the data as possible because that way it's more secure - but it's also more expensive. If your smart contract is just some $10 deal then it's probably sufficient to just use 1 or 2 data sources (and so 1 or 2 on-chain fees) because the use case doesn't demand a high level of security.

Sure, it would be cheaper to aggregate responses off-chain as per the long term strategy but settling a contract on-chain in the short term way is still likely to be cheaper than hiring a bunch of lawyers etc

>>7286009
Is Mobius the new Bazingacoin? These have got to be bots

>>7275341
http://www.fintech.finance/fintech-tv/sibos-2017-sergey-nazarov-smartcontract/

Skip to 6:50 but the whole interview is good

>>6850344
>http://www.fintech.finance/fintech-tv/sibos-2017-sergey-nazarov-smartcontract/

6:48 is when he talks about derivatives. Pic related contains the quote

>>4868964
thanks brah

>>4848025
was about to post this myself

good article - especially if your hands are getting weak

>>4846405
i've been looking for this image for ages, thanks

do you know where it comes from?

tfw all in betting on a smart contracts future

>>4771937
Sad. I wish you the best with link but this is just sad.

Whatever passes the time until the moon mission though I guess

>>4690308

>>4684510
ETH had ZERO communication. People didn't even ask.

We still had the stock market long term mentality and thought 100% gains in a YEAR were ridiculous. You wouldn't have dreamed of trolling Vitalik or the ETH team on Slack lol