/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20005341

The customers pay in fiat because the shit token is not needed. The treasury accepts the FIAT and buys the QNT token because they are trying their best to find an use for the absolute dog shit of a token.

Then, once the licenses expire, it's dump time.

Centralized dog shit scam that can be replicated in 5 minutes continues to fool the investors and make them fomo into the new 300k quant batch the team just sent to exchanges. Basically $2.7M worth of tokens being dumped on $200k+ worth of buy walls across all exchanges.

the SIA partnership is actually like the Oracle and Amazon one, but with a less broader scope (banks). Oracle and Amazon cover more than the Fintech aspect. Quant is listed on both with 0 adoption so far.

And by this, I'm saying that SIA has never enforced the interoperability solution to the "muh 580 nodes". It's up to the banks to decide whether to use the shitcoin Quant or choose another interop solution in the future. The whole bullish thing about the partnership was having the nodes using Quant in production in the end.

Which is pretty hilarious considering that you could use the CENTRALIZED API without partnering with anyone. Just use the centralized SDK (head over to github/npm) to communicate with the other blockchains via BPI lol and then build around it.

>Software licenses are expensive af.

You don't even have a price structure in place for the licences. lol Not even proper incentives around Quant to make it remotely decentralized. I don't even know how to define this shitcoin properly....

Meanwhile, Gilbert bless....300k being unloaded on the fomo tards. That's $2.7M being dumped on $200k worth of buys on both IDEX/Bittrex. 13x over that ... Congrats

>>19988637

with one hand he's trying to dispel the FUD and with the other he's sending 300k fresh Quants to dump on the market

50k were already sent to Bittrex

///

But leaving this aside, I'm looking to see if the 580 nodes are using Quant already, because if not, I'm trying to understand the difference between Oracle marketing their services to an even wider range of industries (personal solutions + ISV partnerships) vs SIA marketing their services (personal solutions + ISV) to their 580 nodes.

Excerpt from the press release.
"This important milestone is the result of a partnership launched between Quant Network and SIA that allows mostly banks and financial institutions - through the SIAchain infrastructure - to adopt cross-platform and interoperable blockchain solutions"

>that allows mostly banks and financial institutions to adopt cross platform and interoperable blockchain solutions

Looks to me that this solution wasn't pushed to their customers at all.