/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>7824366
>supply being low
but other than, correct, Marines
-+$100-$1,000 = utility for legacy systems to effectively purchase the usage of smart-contract technology of the future without having to overhaul their systems AND multiply that by the speculation AND multiply that by the returns from pooling/staking
Although, the timeline is speculative, marines. Meme magic alone will not make this happen. If the nodes really do work as intended, we better shill and work at this harder than /pol/ did during the elections. But I don't think that will be a problem, considering the religious following this project is gathering, lol

>>7794339
Nope, but it goes to show that there is a lot of gold here to find. Search the archives for important topics. Most anons are kind enough to repost good shit regularly

>>7780220
Also see
>>7772317
and pic related

It is the ultimate litmus test of do you even DYOR.
It's impossible to know without digging deeper, and that is probably the most valuable skill /biz/ will ever give you

On another note: we'll start seeing a shift toward quality discussion with more effort on those who are interested.

If anyone was around for the 2016 elections, there was a concerted effort to collate and spread important info quickly. I'd like to contribute a movement toward that.

For example, here's a very solid discussion around general trends on market caps, and why they're very deceiving. We're still in the early stages, despite the sudden rise and downtrend we've seen:

https://archived.moe/biz/thread/7228543

>>7769461
>>7769131
>>7768781
>>7769377
From a general sentiment perspective:
When you live long enough and acquire enough experience in life you begin to notice a trend. The 'smartest' person in a room is rarely the most successful one. In fact while 'smart' people tend to have an advantage when it comes to their minimal range they are at a clear disadvantage when it comes to the higher range. This is due to the fact that modern society deems 'expertise' as the distinguishing aspect of intelligence, but expertise often induces tunnel vision. I have a cousin who works at Google, makes a six figure salary, and only invested in Ethereum in 2017, despite me telling him about it in late 2015. The reason is simple, he developed tunnel vision.

On the contrary the most successful person in a room isn't the one with the most 'expertise' but the one with a broad knowledge base who is good at understanding trends and people. A lot of people don't remember that when Ethereum came out people were legitimately LAUGHING at the idea of a smart-contract, because people believed it was a neat proof of concept with zero real world application. And it still has zero world application, the difference is now the people interested in ethereum aren't the 'experts' (who cynically dismiss everything) but the 'big picture' types who will invest because they see potential. Oracles are the same, anyone who's been in crypto for more than 3 years has seen this all before: experts dismiss, huge drop, lies low, gains investors interest, balloons due to speculation, cools off, real world application.

It's the same fucking pattern over and over. The real question is are you gonna be one of those 'experts' who doesn't buy bitcoin despite knowing about it way before everyone else because you ''''understand'''' that it's limitations are too great and it's use case too narrow, or are you gonna be a big picture guy who realises this could one day have an impact and invest now for when that day comes?

>>6214853

>>6173374

Read this and buy Chainlink.

Wait for few years and receive 20 lambos.