/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52372920
At this point a NFT dividend isn't impossible but I don't find it likely. Matt Finestone had a good indication of his interest of a non fungible token in stock distribution, specifically about how they can be used as "shares"
>Tokenization, does not change the underlying value of private securities, they should still be valued by their fundamentals. But with a liquid secondary market, we can tack on a liquidity premium. The liquidity premium comes from the ability to more easily and cost-effectively buy/sell a security. (You can also think of this as the removal of the illiquidity discount.)
>It’s safe to say there is interest in all sorts of private companies, real estate, sports teams, art, and much more. "what do stakeholders stand to gain?"
>"Investors" gain access to investment opportunities previously precluded, and trade them in liquid secondary markets.
But he's no longer a part of the company. Which is fine, he did his job and his legacy still lives on through his projects. At this point I wouldn't worry about an NFT dividend, we're already seeing market wide destabilization and asymmetric risk. We've already won, it's just a waiting game.
>>52373134
For now. Immutable X partnership is actually seeing increased volume for the marketplace. Which is ironically huge for something that has put literally no effort in advertisement and is still under development. This isn't even me coping, look into Gamestops development stage and their predictions on the marketplaces' revenue.