/biz/ - Business & Finance

>that pump to 1.86 all of a sudden

BINANCE BOTS FREAKING OUT, DESPERATELY TRYING TO STOP THE DOTB

>>28343461
lmao no they did not.
the 39k airdrop is probably what they paid, so less than 80k

>>24609209
>bought a bmw
that's been debunked by snopes

CAN THE INTEL/iEXEC JEETS FIX THEIR WEBSITE!!!???!?!? HOLY FUCK READ SOME OF THESE SENTENCES:
>https://builders.intel.com/ai/membership/iexec

"Trained AI models are normally highly valuable as their training requires time, money and huge amounts of data, and are considered as strategy assert which need to be protected."

What the absolute fuck? Who would ever take this project seriously after reading that?

at least with LINK we know the team had skills and that the project was going somewhere.
The iexec team has never built anything before this.. They were garbage men, welders, and other shit before they became desktop grid enthusiasts turned "Token Founders"..
Not to say those jobs don't take skill, but they have no business running a software team, let alone building a decentralized platform.
Every iexec side project has been borderline a scam/heavily mismanaged. Some of those by RLC "Founders". RLC has 0 chance at success. It is a shit show used to enrich the founders with very little given back to community for actually keeping it going and contributing.
RLC Founders keep their stash in BTC for the most part(some 6,000 BTC). Should be all you need to know in their own faith of their project.
I'm a worker who has seen the show from the inside.. I only keep my node running to turn it into other more valuable coins at this point. Trust me when I say it's a complete shit show. If it weren't for a few very smart worker pools, the wheels would have fallen off already.
"Invest" at your own risk, but i assure you it won't end well.

twitter fud

>just one more tweet and we'll be $100

none of the teams tokens have moved in years
unlike... a certain somebody's
>>22896627
this, fucking announcements of annoucnements