/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56945902
this...this cannot be real holy shit.
How DEEP was this scam exactly lol

i can imagine music vids unironically popping up when BTC inevitably reaches 150-200k in the future. Just you wait /biz lol

>>24177114
When will you desperate bagholders realize that the token you're holding is literally worthless dead weight? Countless AMAs, countless promises and in the end nothing has been delivered yet. How many times will you have to false excitement for an useless UI improvement? Since when have you been waiting for marketing to takeoff? How do you expect the Coinmetro exchange to make its presence known against Binance, Kraken, Coinbase or Kucoin? Because it somehow happens to offer the "lowest fees" on the market? Because it's European-based and friendlier to regulations?

These are selling arguments that you should actually look at and think twice before endorsing them to others. Imagine thinking crypto enthusiasts would support yet another CEX reporting your grades to fill the taxman's pockets. Worse even, imagine believing that maintaining low fees with current XCM's tokenomics is something doable. Let me tell you something that should knock some sense into your mind : the whole thing wasn't sustainable to begin with. I can count the entire user base of coinmetro with 4 hands worth of fingers. Daily volume is astonishingly low, and the tokenomics are flawed : it's just a smokescreen to hide that it's actually a ponzi/money laundering scheme. XCM cannot be valued above 10 cents. XCM holders are now tasked to try their best to recruit as many people as possible into the exchange to keep the money and the rewards flowing in, otherwise the house of cards inevitably falls upon itself without warning as soon as the tokens bought by Kevin Murcko/the exchange ALL GET SOLD AT ONCE to break even. Let me repeat myself here : the XCM token CANNOT be valued more than 10 cents per token, if not less.

Will they get paid?