/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27117031
It honestly depends on the asset you buy, anon. For example, this same demoralizing post would have been detrimental to LINK holders between the 2017 ICO and December 2018, who knew short PnD tier spikes amounting to nothing. Surely, there are people sharing your mindset who ended up selling too early with a meagre 20%, or even panic selling because as you so elegantly put it:
>if you are holding something, it means you bought at a loss.
When those people could actually have bought more on the way down for example to reduce their exposure. Maybe those who exited and sold early have found other short term opportunities to make money on, but you and me both understand that by multiplying the trades you also multiply your potential failures and timing. This is a sad reality and you cannot convince me otherwise, if it wasn't the case the border between trading and gambling wouldn't be so foggy.

The issue here is finding an actual good asset to grant you positive returns no matter what despite the short term market fluctuations, given enough time. This cannot be done with TA. You need to look at the fundamentals, assess the risk and potential growth, place your trade and forget about it or autistically insist for years on end that you made the right choice. LINK holders did this and in the end, they were right. They weren't lucky for holding this asset that might never have delivered for 3 years straight, with one year completely devoid of good news and an agonizing wait in between all the schizo posting.

This is why I will never sell. Not until $1000

>>22853121
>he didn't pool 80% of his stack at 40 cents

>>21970932
20k would be a suicide stack. 100k, which should cost about 2.8 ETH by now, should unironically be make it tier looking at the total supply. This is how early you are, anon. I would advise grabbing a suicide bag, then check periodically how things progress. Liquidity sucks today, but it's a sign that we're early.

>>19452109
I see where you're coming from. However, after that pathetic FUD yesterday thanks to that Fred retard, I believe gentle shilling could help get people into buying, just like the comfy threads have been doing since Friday actually. Most of the speculators saw an opportunity to make their quick 10x and cash out, but for the few who actually took the time to ask to people willing to explain it's just a matter of patience.

>>19452116
Supply is constantly decreasing, thanks to the tokens that get burned every transaction. The pool will eventually have to buy from people if it wants to keep that 20% fixed value between the 5 tokens, I believe that what comes next is self explanatory. But people need to hold and accumulate as much as possible before pajeet/normie adoption which I'll be doing. The price even dipped down to 0.0082 as I type.