/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12391030

>>10922328
>>10924386

Nano holder here but I am pretty objective and have a sense of reality.

Here is the Rich List - it was down when someone asked about it last week.

Not counting Binance, Kucoin, etc -- the top 100 addresses own like 40-45% of Nanos. Compared to every single ICO which have top 100 addresses owning 65-95% of the supply this is pretty awesome.

But it is nowhere near the "Nano is now distributed with the dump" that Nano holders hope for. I am not sure if any premined coins can every get to the distribution of POW coins. Even with POW the newer the coin the worse the distribution -- Litecoin, Doge, etc don't have anywhere close to the distribution of Bitcoin. But even then Litecoin distribution is much better than Nano.

It's not a knock on Nano, it's just a problem with supply being created out of thin air and they have done a much better job with distributing that than any ICO out there, all these China Hustle coins and outright American scams like Ripple or Stellar.

https://raiblocks.net/page/frontiers.php?limit=10000

>>10860425

Nano started this fucking bull run.

>>10839000

This is a long term hold gentlemen. You're not even holding this for it's current measly gains. This shit is going to go absolutely parabolic when an actual bull market arrives. Give it a few years.

2 nights ago I bought some more when it dipped to $2.37 from $2.60

Last night there was a sell wall dumping 82K Nanos bringing the price down to $2.60. Snagged it up. Didn't make any sense since Nano had just received publicity among a lot of crypto people at the blockchain scaling conference.

Wake up with a raging hard on.

Nano has been available for cheap pickups at night. Last night I picked up a little at $2.30 when it dropped from $2.60. Today looks like it dropped from $3.00 into the $2.60 range.