/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50996809
... the problem is they need to talk to the main folder and if that main folder can't scale, which we just discussed, cannot. Then fees go up regardless.
Now, near actually works in a different way, maybe akin to ETH2, but even the founder of near addmited to me that it has the same scaling limits as cosmos.
Scaling is not all though, they are both also centralized and even wrose, proof of stake, but that's not the point of this post.

Here is where Kadena and some others work differently. In kadena there is no main folder, block, chain, that is slowing down another. It makes 20 blocks every 30s on 20 different chains, or folder locations, this is basically the dream of Layer2, imagine 1000 layer2s on eth and a wallet that can use all of them at the same time. But the problem with L2 is that it needs to settle to that low bandwith main chain on ETH.
In kadena there are just the x amount of chains, and the real selling point is that they are as secure as the next.
In cosmos security varies widely across chains, in kadena you can have 1000000 chains and they retain security, no matter how much you scale.
It's a crazy innovation and it's made possible by simply math.

This explains in more detail https://chainweb3d.netlify.app/