/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56208039
>interesting that it's the same guy
They wouldnt have gotten Ted Yin for the job if it wasnt somehow Avalanche related.
>it will be a 'subnet' by default.
I mean sure it doesnt have to be one but if there is a Virtual Machine then it can be a Subnet.
also Avalanche is capable of running a DAG, interestingly the X-Chain used to be one.
Then they changed that and suddenly it turned out Ted Yin was working on BBCA! coincidence?
Something is going on here and we arent seeing all the pieces of the puzzle.
>Aptos, and Sui
FYI these can be subnets, check out the MoveVM.

still in stealthmode

>ICPoors think Emin is the brain behind Avalanche

>>55238703
no you cant because its centralized and limited to a small set of validators.
It doesnt scale.
>if binance goes under
move your assets to a decentralized network like Avalanche.

>>55238722
Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are just Sybil control Mechanisms, by itself they say nothing about decentralization, security, speed or if its a scam or not.
its just spam protection so you dont flood the network with validators to 51% attack it.
Also the best Proof of Stake implementation is on Avalanche.

>>52989761
Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are Sybil Control mechanisms, by itself they say nothing about security, decentralization or efficiency.
Its basically just Spam Protection.

>>52953645
Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are Sybil Control mechanisms, by itself they say nothing about security, decentralization or efficiency.
Its basically just Spam Protection.

>>52686064
another day another brainlet that doesnt understand that Proof of Work and Proof of Stake are Sybil Control mechanisms and by itself say nothing about decentralization, security or efficieny.
Its basically just Spam protection so the network cant be flooded with members that 51% it. In this function PoW and PoS arent that different. Proof of Work is actually Proof of Stake but with extra steps because same as with the stake you have to invest into GPUs/ASICs and same as a PoS Validator you have to run it 24/7 to get paid.

>the ETH chain
Ethereums problem is that the merge centralized Block production, now a handful of very jewish players decide what Block is to be included and which is not. independent Miners got kicked out, they dont participate in the Consensus decisions anymore.
The Ethereum developers also implemented a really shitty version of staking.
>cant run your own validator
>cant unstake
>no variety where to stake
>unstake queue
>slashing
>nobody even really knows what shit they will deliver

If you want to see a good Implementation of Staking look at Avalanche:
>permissionless network that can scale to millions of validators
>can stake however you want: 2 week minimum or 1 year maximum
>you can actually run your own Validator or delegate and support based small NEET Validators (2% delegator fee)
>basically in Avalanche the leaderless consensus is reached by probabilistic sampling thousands of independent nodes over multiple rounds, which results in sub second finality as blocks can be proposed at any time
>no slashing! if your Validator doesnt deliver the uptime you just dont get paid but your stake is never touched
>during staking your coins technically dont leave your wallet
>can validate additional subnets
>dont have to stake through 3rd parties