/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58612254
icp got a different energy about it if you know what i mean it's hard to describe

>>57355352
>Not an argument sorry.
your posts are the equivalent of someone who failed calculus in highschool trying to "own" people about science on reddit by sharing articles that you don't even understand. The science, the tech, none of it really matters. You are copy and pasting some other guys ideas about ICP, an investor who legally has to disclaim that his words should not even be taken as serious investment advice.

And anyone seriously knowledgeable in the crypto space knows many of the best performing investments are so far removed from the "logical" predictions of what should have happened.

That is probably why that guy's fund performance has basically followed the total crypto market cap
https://www.cyber.capital/fund-a
https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/

You are someone with a predisposed idea that ICP is a scam, and so you are looking specifically for opinions and fud validating your own ideas. You can do this with basically any crypto project or investment, but you're failing to consider asset prices are speculative not concrete


>>57355383
>Why would you buy this scam? Look at the all time chart.

Past performance does not indicate future performance, the chart is priced in, and the higher it goes the more compounding the fomo could become because (like you so intelligently pointed out) it's still down 90%