/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15918064

How does it feel to shill same usless rc20/no mainnet toke every day forever now and still stucked bagholding?

>>15866435

>>15795000
Holy checked. We just win. Put me in the screencap too!

30 minutes gone. Another larper blesses the board. And it goes on.

>>14732486

>>14715660
It is simple. BTC money is flowing into Link and it will greatly increase this week. You are welcome.

>>14620140
They don't get if it is really a meme of a meme that memes a meme of a meme that got memed back in the day on /biz to meme the thought of a meme in the first place. And they don't know if they should buy. It is amazing.

Funny thing is its is year 2025 and bsv is still here....

Scw tells storys koreans chinks and other retards fomo to chance hes satoshi and wheel goes on...

Fucking bitcoin gold got 500 mil mc still... btc fork with conman in chardge just wont die...ever...

*parabolic im on fucking mob..

Ofc maybe its just me seeing shit because I baghold 3 assets for over 1000 days soon but I made topic link is undervalued in sats/gwei after link blasted trough 1$ and everyone made fun of me look at us now..

Hope your (redacted) are in a (redacted).

>>14069352

So tell me op why the fuck would anyone "look for next gem" thats gonna save eth instead just accumulate and dca in eth ?

>>13760727
Disclamer:
>I do hold btc
>I do understand how immutable and decentralised are important properties
>I dont give fuck about bsv/bch
>Im not shilling some pajet alts
>just want to talk desu

>there is no greater store of value that will ever be created

Why?
Isnt it ment to be p2p money?
Which fed cant controll so we stick it to the man?
Its in fucking whitepaper

But if promising projext x starts as one thing, create army of early og-s and top buying bagholders, fails miserably one thing it's supposed to do as btc did as digital cash, than that same army of og's and bagholders create narrative how its "store of value" now and defend it as religious zealots to keep it going up pricewise:

how the fuck is it asset class and not failed project turned into multy level marketing?

Now we ahve custodian solutions for people that dont need immutable and decentralised asset (they want it because it's going up but they want someone else to keep it for them), and dont get me started about everything that is bad and makes no sense in LN.
But eaven if it works, lets say LN works out its deflatarotory asset noone wants to spend.

Yes I know btc will go up its best told narrative in markets ever, its retail honeypot at this point it literally won when everyone on earth saw it at 20k just that one time.

I guess my question is:

Is real redpill one that we DO live in clown world???

I still have 1.1 k i got "for fees" back in 2017, for less than 1$ lol -now its over 30k$ so Im not complaining thats unplaned 30x lol this crypto clowworld

>But usecase was "for fees" noone back than could gess they going to pivot around "scam launch platform" etc...

I dunno desu ill never be original bitcoin or eth og but seeing retards formo in around 30$ now makes me wonder do btc/eth og-s look us like retards as i do bnb buyers today.....

Anyway will wait and dump around 100$ I guess this fomo train wont stop now tell me 100k$ for trade i didnt planed and made is not proof of clownworld??

Disclamer:
>I do hold btc
>I do understand how immutable and decentralised are important properties
>I dont give fuck about bsv/bch
>Im not shilling some pajet alts
>just want to talk desu

>there is no greater store of value that will ever be created

Why?
Isnt it ment to be p2p money?
Which fed cant controll so we stick it to the man?
Its in fucking whitepaper

But if promising projext x starts as one thing, create army of early og-s and top buying bagholders, fails miserably one thing it's supposed to do as btc did as digital cash, than that same army of og's and bagholders create narrative how its "store of value" now and defend it as religious zealots to keep it going up pricewise:

how the fuck is it asset class and not failed project turned into multy level marketing?

Now we ahve custodian solutions for people that dont need immutable and decentralised asset (they want it because it's going up but they want someone else to keep it for them), and dont get me started about everything that is bad and makes no sense in LN.
But eaven if it works, lets say LN works out its deflatarotory asset noone wants to spend.

Yes I know btc will go up its best told narrative in markets ever, its retail honeypot at this point it literally won when everyone on earth saw it at 20k just that one time.

I guess my question is:

Is real redpill one that we DO live in clown world???