/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53797589
I will address the points in this pic, where I can.
>[Marketing: paid shills section]
Your screenshot shows nothing. However, even if it turns out to be true then what's the issue? Is there a problem with paying for marketing, including paying people to advocate for it on online forums?
>pajeet shill
Funny, and probably true. But not really an issue...
>Logo
Non-issue.

>Technicals
>it cannot scale anyway
Yes it can. It scales infinitely horizontally via subnets
>Does not support cross-subnet transactions
AValanche Warp Messaging (ie. subnet-subnet communication) is here. Your pic is outdated
>permissioned subnets
Permissionless are coming still.
>double-spends
Double-spend happened years ago, near mainnet launch. The issue was rectified and hasn't reoccurred since. In other words, it's no longer an issue.
>non-history preserving consensus
I can't answer that one with my knowledge
>20% of AVAX staking power can put Tx on hold indefinitely
Avax has the highest Nakamoto coefficients among all chains that aren't Bitcoin. YOu can google this.
>Validator IPs are locked
>need trusted internet identification
I can't respond to these
>low security subnet attacks can propagate into more important ones
Totally horseshit fake news. This is the whole point of not making the subnets have shared security: if one fails then the failure is completely localized. Each subnet is responsible for its own security only.