/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23904358
I've seen zero proof of Craig Wright not being Satoshi. Satoshi was posting from VPN

>>23587552

nakamoto consensus and segwit?????
No one care about BTC hashrate. You guys creat new fork so enjoy it.
You are right BTC isnt Bitcoin

Bitcoin = A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System

>>22543578

>>16820153
That's how it end when people mess up with code, that they don't actually understand. BTC's death is a matter of time. After that BCH or BSV will take it's place.

Imagine not investing in 185IQ Chad genius.

>>16424902
Thx 10 rupees per post.
We BSV shills hold only BTC

>>16217267
>>16217271
>>16217296
>>16217313
>>16217327
>>16217341
>>16217357
>>16217371
>>16217387
>>16217402
>>16217419

"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year." SN 2010

>>16204599
You still trust miners.
segwit is consensus?? It's FORK!!
Ok Satoshi was wrong and Blockstream DEV are this smart guys

>>16200925
I didn't know. Why it's a scam?

TIK TOK Greg
Bitcoin SV (BSV)
$130,34 USD (2,09%)
0,01470750 BTC (4,05%)

Buy bitcoin Sirs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YepHOb9huY

"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year."SN 2010

Satoshi was big blocker if you dont like it STIFF

"A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year." 2010 SN