/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25763946
why would one of the dozen stable coins imploding affect the future of crypto at all outside of tether itself? literally just use a different stable coin or I don't know, FIAT? The actual thing it's supposedly backed by? It isn't like Tether somehow gives BTC more value, and if they were printing money to acquire BTC it would make no sense for them to sell BTC back into their own token that will supposedly go to zero. The only people that would get rekt from tether are tether holders in this scenario. If anything people desperately trading their tether for literally any other coin or token would be extremely bullish, of course it sucks for the retards that traded for tether at the time.

we win either way

incredibly comfy

>>23740536
My transactions went through in seconds because I pay well. As a consequence I bought 500 more LINK when it was at 10.80. Almost back to 7k linkies, I think LINK will crab until btc hits 20k, then it will have an ETH style run like ETH did when btc hit the ath last cycle

Realistically /biz/, how far could I go with just a $100 investment? It's as much as I could spare at the moment.

Sorry bud, I buy silver.

I can't wait for the economic collapse so that single mothers like in OP's pic finally get what they fucking deserve.

>>16070729
By the way, get a job and go all in on LINK