>>18687495
Why is that the most technologically advanced countries now have consistently the lowest population growth? Tech and population growth form a feedback loop but only up to a certain point. The fewer geniuses a population creates the harder it will be to innovate going forward, especially when the low-hanging fruit has all been plucked. How is this not intuitive?
>>18687490
That's basically the trend, yeah. I'm familiar with these sorts of people because I work in tech. I think it's also partially informed by a predisposition optimistic/idealistic thinking. This is probably why the same demographic/IQ range tends to predominantly hold liberal beliefs. Ultimately I think we all find some sort of substitute for religion/religious thinking. The naive optimism of singularity niggers certainly isn't the worst expression of this that I can think of.
>>18687548
95 IQ poster
>>18687540
>>18687552
>>18687593
130 IQ poster
>>18687606
This