/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4427641
it can do it by increasing the blocksize
>b-but that's centralized!?
no, it's not, anyone can host a full node. going offchain is NOT trustless, and thus defeats the whole point of crypto.

perhaps, block size was always supposed to increase? that the coin is actually supposed to be used as currency? that off-chain segwit trash isn't trustless, thus defeating the whole point of crypto and that mining power was always expected to be consolidated? it's interesting that he mentioned a 51% attack would favour giving yourself more coins rather than ruining the chain that gives your coin value..... almost like, he expected it..............

>>4428766
if anything it's more ethical, the blocksize was always meant to scale

>>4423359
your centralization argument is regurgitated shit.