/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>460731
>>461000
Don't listen to this man/woman.

Send me $500 more m8.

Just a reminder

>>415259
I only have two more, although I think I've seen even more posted. Sometimes you have to wonder how someone can be this stupid.

>Inb5 iHaz
(1/2)

>>407636

>>385018
>>385247
He doesn't have any secrets or knowledge. He simply added his high income to passive index funds (which takes no skill, and he has admitted numerous times that he knows nothing about active investing) at the beginning of one of the greatest bull markets ever, thus giving a quasi-illusion that he's made a lot of money from investing.

What you have to understand is that crane operators, government pensions, truck drivers, insurance companies, miners, morons, etc. have all done the exact same thing he has but the individual people doing it do not have $500,000 a year incomes, so their overall end capital is far smaller, thus looking less impressive.

For example, a person who puts in $50,000 compounded at 20% annually at the beginning of six years ends up with $149,299.

But a person who puts in $500,000 compounded at 20% annually at the beginning of six years ends up with $1,492,992.

The second one, to the typical person, looks far more impressive.

Pic related, I didn't even know it was possible for even the most novice to be this retarded.

>>367399
>>367260
>>367446

Not even the guy you're replying to, but almost everyone on this board knows you're a retard, just ask around.

>>348753
You've admitted in past posts numerous times that you have no clue about how to actively invest, and you have no desire to, so you invest passively. Now you've proven it.

It's a shame you're (despite admitting numerous times to know nothing about how to actively invest) trying to trick Anons into buying a shit stock. The stock you just pushed has absolutely nothing positive about it now, nor in its ten year history. Literally EVERY criteria a part of judging a stock on in EVERY one of the last TEN YEARS (and more) of this company is in the red and in the negatives. It's worth NEGATIVE money per share. Could it go to $10 a share? Sure, possibly. But it's certainly not worth that much and not justified, and you might as well go to a casino with your money. For anyone wondering if they should ever take this tripfag seriously, see pic related. Be warned.