/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23958106
You should be able to discern real projects form fake ones by now. Look at the difference between this/other statera posts, and the guy talking about RLC.

STA:
>the price will go up
>supply/demand will make the price go up
>burn will make the price go up
>the dashboard will make the price go up
>(this thread) marketing will make the price go up
They all assume a buyer, but do not mention a use case for the token. There is no use. It isn't needed. It doens't actually *do* anything.

RLC guy:
>utilisation of idle processing power by institutions
>incentivises more server farms to pop up for anyone who needs processing power in a decentralised processor market
>etc
These are real uses. There are customers of the end product, which isn't a token - it is data. The token is used to buy the data, but it is not the token which claims to have value, rather the network which runs on the token.

>>23958177
This comment is a great example.
>it has value because the price will go up
>the price will go up because people will buy it
>people will buy it because the value is the price will go up

>>23958114
Shitcoins fuck off.

>>23958166
>less secure
>more expensive
It works and has customers. RLC does not. Until RLC is actually cheaper, then this isn't an argument, just speculation, and businesses don't care who will provide the cheapest processing power in 10 years, but who provides the cheapest processing power *now*.