/biz/ - Business & Finance

remember coomers, da j00s are on our side, literally can't lose

>>23514373

>>23315384
That's why it is going down now, btw.
97% of the stock is owned by institutions and billionaires. Very little influence is placed upon it by paper hands.
So the reason it goes down like this is because of more shorting.
So what happens?
GME isn't going anywhere.
Will this continue to 160%?
180%?
200%+?
It is obviously not sustainable. I just want to be there when it pops.

>>23289550
>no reason
I don't think you understand how this works.

Reminder to short shills on GME,
97% of the shares are owned by big boys and institutions. That means only 3% are owned by randoms like us.
You might as well go shill in front of Wall street and hope for the best.

>>23275388
We have institutions on our side as well
They own 97% of GME

GME boys this image means its over.
We've won.
All you have to do is hold.
Or don't I don't give a fuck because non of us matter in triggering the squeeze.
But if you want to make money, just hold.

Somebody just posted this in the old thread.

Buying blackrock ETFs exclusively from now on