/biz/ - Business & Finance

For groups to think or do anything, only through a collective need or dream can it be manifested into reality. That's when people get together, share ideas and visions, and in a good atmosphere, come up with things that work. Only a group with collective ideas and vision can produce anything.

After spending a good three years of creative creative brainstorming, after getting the basic Idea and using powerful brainstorming technique for better productivity, energy and our worth as people, groups begin to exist.

Out of nothing, groups spontaneously form.

Smart contracts is the year of the prophecy fulfillment.

>>16778042
THERE'S A NUMBER OF ISSUES WITH OP AND HIS THREAD.
1. OP IS 19.
2. OP IS FUCKING GIRLS WHO DON'T KNOW HOW TO FUCK. THEIR PUSSIES ARE ON TRAINING WHEELS.
3. OP LACKS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
4. OP SOLD HIS TICKET TO FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE FOR A USED LUXURY CAR TO LOOK RICH
5. OP SOLD THE NEXT BITCOIN TO LOOK RICH NOW INSTEAD OF PERMANENT WEALTH LATER.


LESSON:
DO NOT BE LIKE OP. OP IS A FAGGOT.

Everyday we, as evolving humans, learn something new. When we are presented with a new situation, we do our best to relate to this experience with the knowledge that we already have. As time goes on, we may find that our original thoughts and theories may have been incorrect and need to be changed a bit. We do not discard the experience all together as though it never happened. What we do is note -what we have learned and adjust our understanding accordingly. Everything in the world as we know it has been constructed by the limitations of our own minds at the time that we experienced it. Thereafter, we merely build upon our own thought constructions for what we perceive to be "real" or the "truth." Once you understand how to change your perceptions, there is nothing in this world that your mind cannot change.
In relation to entities, this simply means that we re- ally may not know exactly what entities are, but we know that they exist. As we learn more about them through our interaction and practice of working with them, we adapt what we have learned to fit into our new understandings or our experiences.
It is important to not discard the validity of any type of entityjust because we do not understand it or have evi- dence supporting it. Rather, we must accept our experiences and understand that we are only limited by our experiences. The more we learn about a subject, in this case entities, the more that they come into our realm of understanding, much like the American Continents did for Europeans that were unaware of their existence.
You create entities and can accordingly determine what such entities will do for you. You don't use the per- ception of belief with entities, but instead use the perception of attributes with your entity. To put it simply, you choose to perceive that an entity has specific talents about it that will help in your operations.

It's been sitting under your noses the entire time, Anon.

Chainlink+Ethereum Enterprise Alliance

If you have been browsing biz for more than a year and don't have at least a stack of 5K LINK, you have failed at life.

LINK was a reality IQ test in every sense of the word.

Almost every person I have met offline who owns LINK have been remarkably based.

Yay, I'm going to make money.

But what about those with stacks of 200K LINK or more? Their wealth will be unfathomable.

What will they do to benefit society? How long will they rub in their success to old contacts who didn't believe?

Or will they create legacies with the kind of money will be come into?

Have you ever been in a situation where you think that your life may significantly change for the better? What if you were to imagine your life 6 months from now and you look back and you think yourself for making a significant investment into link and then having your life miraculously transform within that time frame? Can you picture it? But more importantly, do you have the courage to do the needful?

>>15491674
>what will Link's /r/buttcoin be called
The short answer is No-Linkers Anonymous.

But there's a way out for them:
The best way to understand a new paradigm is to ask questions about it. A great tool for probing the inner workings of something is the philosopher's stone. Its basic principle is that you should ask questions that will give you the facts in a concrete context. That way, you can then determine if the facts really lead to the appropriate conclusions. For example, in order to understand the implications of the new paradigm we need to answer: Does the new theory really require the whole tree to be in place, or does the tree simply change as it gains more members? Would it be more difficult for us to construct our own tree if that would lead to more tree-fitting or would it remain the same? Are the parameters of our new paradigm as powerful as the old paradigm? If they are, can we apply this new paradigm to a problem we already know exists?

Those who said Sergey has no vision (the same speech!) have not been paying attention, particularly to his earliest appearances.

Chainlink is being constructed to fill the role of an idealised arbiter of truth, connected to the most perfectly dispassionate executor, in the form of public smart contract chains.

This is in fulfilment of the deepest Platonic ideals of contract and governance that have ever been conceived, but which have remained out of reach, mere approximations even under the highest forms of lawful Republic, as at every step human capriciousness asserts itself and corrodes the final product, the freedom of contract found when our pledges are given force by Leviathan. Alas, ‘from the crooked timbers of humanity, no straight thing was ever made’.

By redrawing the locus of consensus as that of a precise ledger with sound game-theoretical guarantees at its edges, and iron-clad stricture within, rather than a continuously renegotiated knife fight, the level of trust required to engage in mutually beneficial enterprise plummets precipitously.

But what does it plummet to? The trust required is now neatly circumscribed to the trust in the information delivered unto our new Leviathan. There is fortunately a market for this trust, a pool of agents who are willing to stake their reputation and collateral on any piece of digitisable information on which it is possible to come to consensus. The truth is a most excellent Schelling point, and one which well-incentivised agents can reliably settle on.

Do not underestimate the power and the generality of this arrangement in its maturity, nor the amount of human and economic potential that this will unlock.

Welcome to the trust market

LINK is on an upwards diagonal and my downside target has been hit. LINK is consolidating. The correction provided the opportunity to finally hit a personal goal of 150k LINK.

3 sets of trips, I will share good crumbs and analysis.

No insider. No larp. Great info.

3 sets of trips.

Good luck