[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.58419391 [View]
File: 761 KB, 2724x673, KYC_and_taxes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58419391

>>58418926
>it isn't priced in because
>because
>look at previous charts
Motherfucker, we've already had an ATH and came off it. The Bitcoin ETFs have already caused the Wall St guys who, contrary to the average trader pre-2020, have a foresight greater than a week.
>naively attributing efficiency to the market which oversimplifies why and how large bull cycles occur
This means nothing. Do you even know what market efficiency is? Saying that previous cycles were large is saying that markets were inefficient. However, this cycle is clearly different as evidenced by the gigantic fucking hole in the theory of Bitcoiners that we've had another ATH right before the halvening and right after Bitcoin ETFs started operation.
>bit less absurd than saying it is “priced in” ahead of time
Do you know what "priced-in" even means? It's when a price increases before an event takes place. Like for example, a new tax or new tariff will cause a dip in stock prices even if the measure don't take place right away. The term is meant to refer to price action ahead of time, Bitcoin or not. That's the entire concept. But applied to Bitcoin it's suddenly "absurd", because it is.
>nocoiner
AAAAAHHHH the emotional investor. That explains the post.
>>58418940
>implying every Bitcoin cycle will be the same until 2100
2 trillion 2017 USD / coin by 2100 amirite? The graph sure looks exponential from the *checks notes* 3 datapoints we've had. Not an asymptotic growth as the markets learn to integrate the supply with the formed demand. Not a multi-decade inverse parabola. Forget about the copecharts saying we should be at $150k-$200k by now, get ready for PlanC.

>> No.58398235 [View]
File: 761 KB, 2724x673, KYC_and_taxes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58398235

>>58351802
I think the strategy to show Bitcoin's failure and point to Monero as the solution is a better way to go about it. The switch from Bitcoin to Monero is radical, people can't teeter on the edge and be honest about the state of crypto for long.
Edits like the community has already done, check out these for inspiration
https://files.catbox.moe/ti96sc.webm
https://files.catbox.moe/hn5byd.webm
https://files.catbox.moe/v3vcp0.webm
https://files.catbox.moe/jbmun8.mp4
https://files.catbox.moe/ex9cb3.mp4
Obviously a video is something high effort, but I think it packs a certain punch that "and an unknown amount of Monero" type of macros don't have.
>>58352797
Anon has a point, maxis are extremely gullible people. Memetic warfare should work if you figure out how. Has the Monero community ever had something like the laser eye? Or slogans like NgU or infinity/21. They are retarded, don't get me wrong, but they work to convince non-maxis into converting into a religion.
We have Monero-chan already. Extremely memable as shown in this very thread. The question now becomes one to exposing people to her.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]