/biz/ - Business & Finance

excited for you guys

>>12522418
The kick inside was released in like a half a dozen or more countries in '78. The fuck are you on about m8?

>>11657105
Most importantly, bZx is working with etherisc:

>https://etherisc.com/

>https://twitter.com/b0xNet/status/1018111608084664320

Etherisc was one of the biggest sponsors of the D1 decentralized insurance convention that Sergey just spoke at

This seems like white labeling maybe, would make sense because Etherisc is using Oraclize at the moment:

>https://blog.etherisc.com/video-under-the-hood-of-etheriscs-flight-delay-dapp-85ef96777c39

But from day one Etherisc has had fundamental issues with Oraclaize:

>https://etherisc.com/whitepaper

"In our FlightDelay Insurance, we also have such a contract: we use oraclize to obtain
provable data from our data provider, flight stats. Oraclize charges us with some finneys
for calling their contract, but we have no guarantee that Oraclize will deliver. We have
two options to incentivize Oraclize to provide their service properly:
1. in a “buyers market” (i.e. a market with many competing oracles) we could
demand Oraclize to put some tokens in a “staking contract”, which will return the
tokens if they deliver in time and forward the tokens to us in case they miss their
obligations.
2. in a “sellers market” (i.e. a market with only one or few oracles) we can offer
Oraclize an additional profit, again by staking tokens in a “staking contract”, but
with reversed roles: Etherisc will stake tokens, and Oraclize will earn these tokens
if they deliver, and in case they don’t deliver, the tokens are returned to us.
3. Of course, both options can be combined: both parties staking tokens, and the
contractor earning tokens according to his performance."

I dunno what do you guys think?