[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.23868956 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, 1584835917597.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23868956

>> No.20118149 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, 1585092348617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20118149

>>20117489
Whats up 42.

Heres a thread I made, but it got bumped out and archived.

>>20108366

>> No.19372996 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19372996

>> No.18740164 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, 1584835917597.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18740164

Chainlink getting integrated in Microsoft Word

Still under $10

How much good news do we need? Also how crazy is this month actually regarding Chainlink news

>> No.18061368 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, 1584835917597.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18061368

Synchronicity (German: Synchronizität) is a concept, first introduced by analytical psychologist Carl Jung, which holds that events are "meaningful coincidences" if they occur with no causal relationship yet seem to be meaningfully related.[1] During his career, Jung furnished several different definitions of it.[2] Jung defined synchronicity as an "acausal connecting (togetherness) principle," "meaningful coincidence", "acausal parallelism" or "meaningful coincidence of two or more events where something other than the probability of chance is involved"[3]. He introduced the concept as early as the 1920s but gave a full statement of it only in 1951 in an Eranos lecture.[4]

In 1952 Jung published a paper "Synchronizität als ein Prinzip akausaler Zusammenhänge" (Synchronicity – An Acausal Connecting Principle)[5] in a volume[6] which also contained a related study by the physicist and Nobel laureate Wolfgang Pauli,[7] who was sometimes critical of Jung's ideas.[8] Jung's belief was that, just as events may be connected by causality, they may also be connected by meaning. Events connected by meaning need not have an explanation in terms of causality, which does not generally contradict the Axiom of Causality but in specific cases can lead to prematurely giving up causal explanation.

>> No.17992838 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17992838

>>17992723

>> No.17023136 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17023136

>>17021892
>>17022095
That's your juror now.
kek

>> No.16885559 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16885559

>>16885480

>> No.14428813 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14428813

>>14428283
picrelated, whitepaper in a nutshell

>> No.13964025 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13964025

>>13963986
picrelated sibos presentation in a nutshell

>> No.13955601 [View]
File: 217 KB, 1816x1030, s35nsn2356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13955601

>>13955585
c o m f y

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]