/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18119896
Congrats on your success.

4 more years.

philosemitism > black cock worship

They are not successful, they are being stolen from. They are subject to among the most fortuitous market conditions in the world owing to geography and demography yet pay over half of their wages to their worthless government while receiving nothing in return that isn't available in many other countries that take less. Norwegians in particular have been taxed so severely over the past 30 years that the government, while maintaining a substantial public debt, has a surplus fund worth over $95,000 (might be EUR equivalent actually) per citizen locked away where they can't touch it. Brainwashed faggot losers lmfao

>>13842152
I see, but I don't know how to react to it being a brainlet newfag.
>>13842159
what is fake wall?
>>13842173
binanace around the end of may. there's a lottery for them but you need to hold minimum 50bnb and it's already late to enter. i'm pretty much only on /biz/ so i have no idea how normies and reddit take it so far. After i got justed by fetch i'm not sure about one
>>13842219
i like this guy

>>13812791
>Norwegian who's taxed like WWII never ended to pay for the children he'll never have and the other services he doesn't use or won't until well into his twilight years so that his government can maintain its $195,000 usd equivalent-per head vanity surplus (while still bearing a 30%~ public debt to gdp ratio) it only has because it blindly stumbled upon a rapidly dwindling oil reserve a few decades ago detected

Fuck off Lars

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_revenue_to_GDP_ratio

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt

>a ceo's salary being $100 per employee per year by voluntary contract is theft

>the government taking $10,500 from this same employee per year on threat of violence is justice

>>13665898
We don't take kindly to jokes around these parts (they probably mistook you for the other purple id tee bee h'aitch)

>>13628705

>>13615465
1200

>>13615251
Nope

>>13610958
Not so fast

I'm literally planning on financing a business with my (purely hypothetical) gains though.

>>13573483
First of all the Soviet Union wasn't economic communism or even socialism and no Marxist scholar or critic claims otherwise; any success OR failure you want to attribute to it re socialism is bullshit, but it does make a good case for not giving the power of life or death into the hands of the state

NEETs and homeless were put in work camps (good move imho)

All information regarding the economic and social health of the Soviet Union was filtered through the Glavlit censors (read "the commissar vanishes")

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/03/13/vietnam-capitalism-global-post/70261770/

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/remarkable-fall-chinas-suicide-rate

Keep larping as an illiterate turn of the century Russian peasant on a business forum during the longest stretch of peace and plenty that humanity has ever experienced you fucking retard

>>13530274
Communism is a gay slave mentality ideology stop trying to shoehorn it into every discussion Ivan

>>13519240
I laughed but in all seriousness our food is fine. Our people are just hedonistic dummies that eat compulsively because of low-IQ hoarding instinct. It's a cultural problem (fat acceptance movements don't help obviously)

>t. eats nothing but fast food but is in good shape because I eat maintenance calories and run my dog around the block at least once a day

>>13485054
>the two most relevant geopolitical entities that ever adopted communism actually didn't (Mao was apparently just shittier at it ("Capitalism in One Country" xd) and the people that roleplay as turn of the century illiterate Russian serfs (or toothless slanty eyed coolies in the case of that Jason Urhurhurhur fucking faggot) are retarded gay morons worshiping something that never was and never will be

Good to know; I'm still going to post that picture every five minutes. Enjoy your bunkers Hoxhsucker

>>13480989
describe an example of a zero sum game fren; admittedly I don't know what you're talmbout, gnomesaiyan?

Which one is right, are they mutually exclusive?

You often hear people alluding to a CEO's salary relative to that of their employees in particular. According to an image I'd seen making the rounds, the CEO of Chase bank-reprehensibly-makes 31 million dollars a year, which (undisclosed by the image) is about 1/3rd of 1% of the combined low-end average of all employees (1 CEO making 31 million dollars divided by 256,105 employees = $120 each stolen from each employee)

The combined federal and local government on the other hand take between 20% and 30% of each of these employee's incomes, taxes the company these employees work for 8% of whatever these employees' incomes are (payroll taxes), taxes a percentage of the goods this company produces or services this company renders, taxes a percentage of the goods or services this company purchases from other companies and so on.

t's obvious that government takes much more from each individual employee by a spectacular margin but one could argue that the government provides important services that a business couldn't or wouldn't, however, is not the reverse also true? Businesses provide services and products a government can't or won't.

tl;dr:

ITT let's talk about how your extremely high tax rate has benefited you directly and how, if there were any justice in this world, you would be taxed much more than you are now. Feel free to muse about how if someone making more than you was taxed more your "society" could afford "x", just make sure you don't provide any specific numbers in case they don't work out as well as you'd think they would.

Let's also talk about what you'd do if your income was close to 30% higher than it is now were income taxes hypothetically abolished. Would you save it? Spend it? Donate to charity?