/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52757524
Early access will fill up really quick.
>>52757528
They're insolvent, anon, they've stopped trading in the US and are declaring bankruptcy. I'd get my funds out now if you even still can.

>>50401775
It absolutely is that big a deal.

Everything else is hobbyist vaporware or lacking in security. Chainlink is the only team in the space that builds for actual at-scale adoption, and has both the thorough pedigreed R&D and the FANG-tier bizdev manpower to back it. You either understand it already based on their track record with their defi oracles, or you simply haven't been paying attention, and instead follow marketing promises more than adoption metrics.

Quant has no actual product and no customers, it's complete vaporware with a nice token action but unrelated from fundamentals in reality, meanwhile other bridges already live were rushed to market with poor security and get exploited for hundreds of millions every other week.

CCIP can launch at-scale via their already battle tested and widely adopted networks, they already have the reputation as the industry standard and pre-established industry customers monopoly, they have the biggest middleware market cap to back their staking incentives, they have the treasury to keep expanding, they've already deployed live services on all the leading chains with thorough audits, etc etc etc.

It's mind blowing how so very few in the space can fathom how Chainlink has already won the interoperability race due to all the groundwork they've already laid successfully while everything else struggle with building basic foundations.

Furthermore, CCIP combined with staking and the monopoly on price feeds, will open the floodgates for direct value capture for both the protocol and the token holders, which will create a positive feedback loop of demand, as Chainlink nodes will be uniquely positioned to earn juicy fees from being the central infrastructure of all cross-chain & off-chain smart contracts operations, offering the rare sustainable & safe yield, in a time where ponzi yields dry off and platform risks scare off big players. Supply will decrease as demand goes up + retail-facing service & marketing. $$$

>>49748676
These posts remind me of when nexo were being short squeezed. Bulgarians in every thread with a combination of seething and 'anyone who doesn't lend to nexo for 6% is a cuck'. Then they got fucked, glorious.

The difference is, today, they are desperate for liquidity on EVERY exchange. Exciting.

>chainlink

>>49343442
extremely nice find OP, I was not aware
>>49343592
only a matter of time if this is how they're proceeding

I think this ties in with allowing NEET nodes and DONs to be ran on any network.
If you want a network that any node can stake and participate in, there should also be freedom as to what chain or infrastructure the DON runs on, with only the token and the base structure tying it all together.

>>23058439
>>23058481
>>23058490
>>23058496
>>23058503
>>23058507
>>23058531
>>23058571
>>23058606
>>23059148
>>23059171
>>23058645
>>23059296
>>23059347
>>23059526
>>23059540
>>23059589
stay based my marine brothers. valhalla awaits.

>>23059204
seethe nolinker

>>22974780
>Anyone pushing an identity is suspect which is obviously why I continue to suspect (you).
I don't mind, we all have to stay frosty these days

>>22974780
>This is because you weren't here early days 42
I started browsing /biz/ early 2017, but didn't put the "42" name on until much later
I'm a meme veteran from the 2016 Trump campaign and started with 4chan in 2006 on /b/ like most of us
there is no escaping

>>22974780
>I was thinking of getting a philosopher statue for my bookshelf too
if you end up getting one, share a pic, I'm happy with my acquisition

>>22974811
>Can they really stop crypto ?
this is how we finally move crypto forward
as if Mt. Gox wasn't bad enough, finally shit exchanges like bitmex are going away

It's finance, odds are any regulations will be to the insiders. With tokenization we can now all be insiders.

You're basically getting in on BTC prior to 2017 and when it was still valued less than $10. It's legit, as Chainlink serves an actual purpose. Had I been here sooner I would have bought in and with a lot more. I put my unemployment corona bucks towards a new PC and other shit. Had I invested in LINK I would have had a few thousand right now. Instead I only have 770. Other anons would be able to explain the importance of LINK better than I would

11k is more than enough

sell 5k on the way up
Keep 6k for staking

CHAD IT