/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58460420
>but this Goldberg guy isn’t a big deal, he’s just going through the motions
>oh he’s also fbi-adjacent and was partly responsible for the takedown of madoff?
>and he’s said on multiple occasions he’s a white hat that hates when big business screws the little guy?
>ok but this is just some small clawback because the executives were dumb
>there was no conspiracy to commit short-sale fraud

>>58443080
Good things come to those who wait. On top of all the interesting developments, there was also language in the lawsuit that seemed to exonerate jpm. Stuff like
>bbby executives did not consult jpm when making final decisions on stock buybacks
I think Goldberg would be fine if these executives take the fall for acting alone and the waterfall gets half a billion. But I think he’d be even happier if these executives ratted on jpm to save their own skin. This also explains all the anti-Goldberg shilling that plagued this thread ever since picrel was posted.