/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24525020
White people being less likely to practice nepotism doesn't exclude it from happening at all, stupid, of course you can find examples of it. Even if they hire their family at the same rates as other groups, they're statically less likely to hire a stranger of the same race as them than other groups. Plenty of studies of group bias have confirmed this behavior.
>Why are Hispanics and Blacks, who similarly take up a far higher proportion of the US populace than Jews/Asians do, also not found in these positions?
Simple, lower intelligence and less education. Corporations fall over themselves to hire black people, the problem is that they can't find enough of them that are qualified.
>You are avoiding the most obvious explanations so your only real argument is "DURRR globohomo".
This is pure projection. You're basically asserting that immigration is part of the problem but you're too stupid to realize it and blame it on corporations rather than the people who are actually deciding who gets into office and who gets to enact these laws. Minorities in the US overwhelmingly vote for mass immigration and they see zero issue with it. They want people to suffer because of their inferiority complex. If only white people voted, all of the immigration loopholes would begin to close. This is increasingly less likely to happen as mass immigration continues.

Also:
>MUH EDUCATION
Cope. I know high school dropouts that would walk circles around your pathetic arguments. All you have to cling to is wealth and education because you're inferior in every other way.