/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8814070oOh, I see you're starting to move the goalposts now. Next step is arguing over what constitutes a "charity scam". Does it still count if they give more than 24% to the actual cause and only pocket the rest? What about 8%? 3%? What about one (1) single percent?
Also the initial statement of that anon was that if someone really wanted to help people in need they could just get out there and start helping them themselves, giving resources directly to the people, helping them build up their communities. But of course that's too much effort and it's easier to pay some paperpushers to create a company for you that may or may not get actual shit done, and then put money into it when the cameras are rolling.
>>8814248
>foundation claims to support the healthy lifestyle of individuals and proper nutrition for pregnant women
>it's invested in fast food chains that are notorious for contributing to obesity and related health issues
>b-b-but that's completely irrelevant, don't look at those figures