/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26550897
well fuck you all, i guess not

NAK
Can we try to mention things like NAK and BOTY as much as possible to throw off Top Stonks and any other parasites?
NAK BOTY BUY NAK GET BOTY
Only problem is it’s impossible to get market hours smg to do this

>>24710257
Depends on the setting you’re using it in, I can see something like BTFLY be a staple in the emergency department/in the field/poorer communities. Quick, easy, portable and it gets you the view you need to quickly rule out major problems. My hospital is poor as fuck so we use clunky large ultrasounds that you have to roll around, half these machines are ancient and they cost like $20k.
I’ve seen the other portable devices like the Phillips Lumify and Clarius, although they’ve got better resolution their downsides are:
>You need different probes for different body parts (Abdominal probe, Transthoracic probe, vascular access probe) vs BTFLYs alleged one probe does all
>You have to carry around a tablet/iPad aren’t really able to use your phone vs able to use phone with BTFLY
>More expensive - both go for about $4k a pop compared to BTFLYs proposed $2k
Not quite sure how their subscription models compared cause I haven’t really looked into them.

The people I reckon won’t like it at all are MSK specialists/Orthopaedics where you need very clear views but as a rapid point of care test I can see this being adopted.

Holy fuck that previous thread was a train wreck, do people genuinely invest in options without understanding fundamentally what an option is?

Brainlet anon here, so if TSLA has 950mil outstanding shares, and their equity last quarter was 17600mil. You get $18-17 per share for book value wtf. I really don’t know what I’m messing up with the calculation

>>24378116
LGVW is unironically the only SPAC with staying power.
I asked a nursing roastie who works in ICU what she thought of portable ultrasounds and she said their unit is buying them up, that’s all I fking need to go all in.