/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29980247
Well with or without CSW, BSV will shine.
They have 200+ Devs working full time on the project and things are happening fast and furious.
Believe it or not, Craig does not want to kill BTC and impoverish all the holders.
He will allow things to play out slowly.
He shows his hand now and again but the masses are too busy looking at the shiny number.
Remember from 2009-2015 no one knew Bitcoin was Turing complete, until one day when Craig Wright was outed as possibly being Satoshi, He told everyone that Bitcoin was bigger than they knew and turing complete. They ridiculed him into the dirt. Yet, he was 100% correct.

Think about that. How can ZERO blockchain and Computer Scientists not know that Bitcoin is Turing Complete but one obscure guy does ?
The same reason that people were trying to make digital currency for 20 years and the consensus in 2008 was it CAN NOT be done.
The same reason that in 2017 the consensus was if you make Bitcoins block size 2mb it will crash the network.
There is another human on earth that understands Bitcoin like Craig Wright, because he invented it.

anyway, He drops clues all the time. here was the last one
[pic related]

>>29527177
>>29527245
>>29527177
>>29527245
Last post for now. On January 21st, 2021 there was a Bitcoin Double Spend that resulted in $21 being spend twice on the Segwit network, confirming a longstanding bug and effectively removing the “finite supply” value of BTC (core). The media ENTIRELY overlooked the issue even though it caused a 15% “correction” in the form of a flash crash once word got out. If you look at the date on Shadder’s minting of MarsCoin it was February 21st, 2021 — the same day Elon changed his profile picture and profile description to refer to Mike Hearn’s Article on blockchain forking. The message in the genesis block of the Tokenized MarsCoin? “-21”
>abre tus ojos

>>29526809
Last post for now. On January 21st, 2021 there was a Bitcoin Double Spend that resulted in $21 being spend twice on the Segwit network, confirming a longstanding bug and effectively removing the “finite supply” value of BTC (core). The media ENTIRELY overlooked the issue even though it caused a 15% “correction” in the form of a flash crash once word got out. If you look at the date on Shadder’s minting of MarsCoin it was February 21st, 2021 — the same day Elon changed his profile picture and profile description to refer to Mike Hearn’s Article on blockchain forking. The message in the genesis block of the Tokenized MarsCoin? “-21”
>abre tus ojos

>>29451330
>who is shadders? What project does he work for?GOOGLE IT
->21? Isn’t there a lot of 21 references in the 1-21-21, $21 double spend?
-cough-
>21 January - Double spend for $21
>21 February - Elon Musk changes his profile to meta fork
>21 February - Elon Musk uses Mike Herns 2015 article as his profile pic
> 21 February - Mike Hearns forwards SAID article from Craig Wright's Slack account
>21 February - Elon changes his profile picture to the picture from the Mike Hearns article
>21 February - You can now send BSV to a BCH address on Coinbase
>21 February - Who is X is answered
>21 February - "Mars Coin" minted by Steve Shadders
> 21 February - BSV goes up $21.55
> 21 Febuary - Gavin Andersson, The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project is 55 years old

>>29356198
>21 January - Double spend for $21
>21 February - Elon Musk changes his profile to meta fork
>20 Febuary - Curiously Craig Wright posts Mike herns 2015 Article in full
> 21 February - Elon Musk uses Mike Herns 2015 article as his profile pic
> 21 February - Mike Hearns forwards SAID article from Craig Wright's Slack account
>21 February - Elon changes his profile picture to the picture from the Mike Hearns article
>21 February - You can now send BSV to a BCH address on Coinbase
>21 February - Who is X is answered
>21 February - "Mars Coin" minted by Steve Shadders
> 21 February - BSV goes up $21.55
> 21 Febuary - Gavin Anderson, The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project is 55 years old

Yes it's rumor. Go back to sleep

Let's wind it back ONE month

>>29312482

>>29299345
The first part was the 21st of last month
There will be 4-5 parts according to Craig Wright

>>28772742
"So, to the BTC perfectionists, money was removed from a wallet, given to another, and the block was erased. Someone who received a transaction and had a block confirmation had their transaction reversed, but this is NOT news and NOT a double spend according to the high priests of BTC Core and their surrogates. "

--some internet dude

and it did happen on the 21st, so more obfuscation from you. The guy who still can't show a quote.
https://forkmonitor.info/stale/btc/666833

>>27645804
On January 21st a transaction from one set of addresses showed in both blocks with outputs of 0.00062063 and 0.00014499 BTC (total 0.00076562 BTC). The sending addresses had a total of 0.00071095 BTC only.

>>27467417
Nothing shitty about BSV except the suppresed price. Technically it is 20 years ahead of BTC.
Lightning isn't a solution.

On January 21st a transaction from one set of addresses showed in both blocks with outputs of 0.00062063 and 0.00014499 BTC (total 0.00076562 BTC). The sending addresses had a total of 0.00071095 BTC only.

"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party. Transactions that are computationally impractical to reverse would protect sellers from fraud, and routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented to protect buyers. In this paper, we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributedtimestamp server to generate computational proof of the chronological order of transactions"
--Satoshi Nakamoto (Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System)

Using a third party (Lightning)
Having a Double spend
Not raising the block size all equal it IS not Bitcoin.

Guess where that double spend came from?
England....

>>27392162
>>27392240
9,000 transactions per second and 350MB blocks today. It's already here.
There won't be a choice soon between faster than Visa transaction and huge date or. 3-4 transactions per second and 1mb blck sizes. Bitcoin can't scale at all unless it breaks the second sentence of the white paper.

You guys will see very soon.

On January 21st a transaction from one set of addresses showed in both blocks with outputs of 0.00062063 and 0.00014499 BTC (total 0.00076562 BTC). The sending addresses had a total of 0.00071095 BTC only.

It came from England...

>>27294434
Oh it's worse than people know.
Look when the double spend happened.
BTW the entire reason Bitcoin was created was a way to stop double spending.

>>27221850
>2. "A transaction from one set of addresses showed in both blocks with outputs of 0.00062063 and 0.00014499 BTC (total 0.00076562 BTC). The sending addresses had a total of 0.00071095 BTC only.

It's all very spooky. People need to understand this from the Bitcoin whitepaper.

"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trustedthird party. Transactions that are computationally impractical to reverse would protect sellersfrom fraud, and routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented to protect buyers. Inthis paper, we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributedtimestamp server to generate computational proof of the chronological order of transactions"
--Satoshi Nakamoto (Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System)